Abstract
Patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) seem to go undetected and not adequately managed within dentistry. To identify these patients, three screening questions (3Q/TMD) have been introduced within dentistry in parts of Sweden. It is not known whether 3Q/TMD affects the clinical decision-making for these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of 3Q/TMD on the clinical decision-making and to analyse whether gender, age and the fee system the individual was assigned to were related to prescribed TMD treatment. This cohort study was carried out within the Public Dental Health service in Västerbotten, Sweden. As part of the routine dental check-up, a health declaration including 3Q/TMD was completed. The study population was randomly selected based on their 3Q/TMD answers. In total, 300 individuals with an affirmative answer to any of the 3Q/TMD, and 500 individuals with all negative answers were selected. The 3Q/TMD includes questions on weekly jaw-face-temple pain (Q1), pain on function (Q2) and catching/locking of the jaw (Q3). The 3Q/TMD was analysed in relation to prescribed treatment assessed from dental records. There was significantly more treatment performed or recommended for 3Q-positives (21·5%), compared to 3Q-negatives (2·2%) (P < 0·001). The odds ratio for TMD-related treatment for 3Q-positives versus 3Q-negatives was 12·1 (95% CI: 6·3-23·4). Although affirmative answers to the 3Q/TMD was related to TMD treatment, the majority of individuals with a screen positive still did not, according to dental records, receive assessment or treatment. Further studies are needed to better understand the clinical decision-making process for patients with TMD.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 573-579 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Journal of Oral Rehabilitation |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 8 |
Early online date | 27 Apr 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2017 |
Funding
The study was approved by the Central Ethical Review Board (Ref no 2012-331-31M, Umeå University, Sweden). Financial support was provided through regional agreement between Umeå University and Västerbotten County Council on cooperation in the field of Medicine, Odontology and Health, and through the Swedish Dental Society. The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Swedish Dental Society | |
field of Medicine, Odontology and Health | |
Västerbotten Läns Landsting | |
Umeå Universitet |