Outcomes of low-vision services using optometric and multidisciplinary approaches : a non-randomized comparison

M.R. de Boer, J.W. Twisk, A.C. Moll, H.J. Volker-Dieben, H.C.W. de Vet, G.H.M.B. van Rens

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Consecutive patients (n = 215) who were referred to optometric (55%) or multidisciplinary (45%) low-vision services and above 50 years of age were recruited from four hospitals in the Netherlands. They completed two vision-related quality of life questionnaires, the Vision Quality of Life Core Measure (VCM1) and the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire (LVQOL), before their first visit with low-vision services and 1 year later. At follow-up, patients referred to multidisciplinary low-vision services had lower scores on the mobility subscale of the LVQOL than patients referred to optometric low-vision services [5.3 points; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2-10.5]. Paired sample t-tests for the two groups of patients taken together show improvement for the VCM1 (3.1 points; 95% CI: 0.6-5.6) and deterioration for the basic aspects of vision (3.5 points; 95% CI: 1.1-5.9) and the mobility (6.6 points; 95% CI: 3.7-9.5) subscales of the LVQOL. In conclusion, people referred to optometric services showed less deterioration in mobility than those referred to multidisciplinary services. No differences were observed for any of the other subscales of the LVQOL and the VCM1. Future research in this field should include randomized controlled designs comparing low-vision services with no treatment or placebo. © 2006 The College of Optometrists.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)535-544
Number of pages10
JournalOphthalmic and Physiological Optics
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Low Vision
Quality of Life
Confidence Intervals
Netherlands
Placebos
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

de Boer, M.R. ; Twisk, J.W. ; Moll, A.C. ; Volker-Dieben, H.J. ; de Vet, H.C.W. ; van Rens, G.H.M.B. / Outcomes of low-vision services using optometric and multidisciplinary approaches : a non-randomized comparison. In: Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2006 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 535-544.
@article{42d64549e54849f7b4039c0761398a07,
title = "Outcomes of low-vision services using optometric and multidisciplinary approaches : a non-randomized comparison",
abstract = "Consecutive patients (n = 215) who were referred to optometric (55{\%}) or multidisciplinary (45{\%}) low-vision services and above 50 years of age were recruited from four hospitals in the Netherlands. They completed two vision-related quality of life questionnaires, the Vision Quality of Life Core Measure (VCM1) and the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire (LVQOL), before their first visit with low-vision services and 1 year later. At follow-up, patients referred to multidisciplinary low-vision services had lower scores on the mobility subscale of the LVQOL than patients referred to optometric low-vision services [5.3 points; 95{\%} confidence interval (CI): 0.2-10.5]. Paired sample t-tests for the two groups of patients taken together show improvement for the VCM1 (3.1 points; 95{\%} CI: 0.6-5.6) and deterioration for the basic aspects of vision (3.5 points; 95{\%} CI: 1.1-5.9) and the mobility (6.6 points; 95{\%} CI: 3.7-9.5) subscales of the LVQOL. In conclusion, people referred to optometric services showed less deterioration in mobility than those referred to multidisciplinary services. No differences were observed for any of the other subscales of the LVQOL and the VCM1. Future research in this field should include randomized controlled designs comparing low-vision services with no treatment or placebo. {\circledC} 2006 The College of Optometrists.",
author = "{de Boer}, M.R. and J.W. Twisk and A.C. Moll and H.J. Volker-Dieben and {de Vet}, H.C.W. and {van Rens}, G.H.M.B.",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00424.x",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "535--544",
journal = "Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics",
issn = "0275-5408",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Outcomes of low-vision services using optometric and multidisciplinary approaches : a non-randomized comparison. / de Boer, M.R.; Twisk, J.W.; Moll, A.C.; Volker-Dieben, H.J.; de Vet, H.C.W.; van Rens, G.H.M.B.

In: Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2006, p. 535-544.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of low-vision services using optometric and multidisciplinary approaches : a non-randomized comparison

AU - de Boer, M.R.

AU - Twisk, J.W.

AU - Moll, A.C.

AU - Volker-Dieben, H.J.

AU - de Vet, H.C.W.

AU - van Rens, G.H.M.B.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Consecutive patients (n = 215) who were referred to optometric (55%) or multidisciplinary (45%) low-vision services and above 50 years of age were recruited from four hospitals in the Netherlands. They completed two vision-related quality of life questionnaires, the Vision Quality of Life Core Measure (VCM1) and the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire (LVQOL), before their first visit with low-vision services and 1 year later. At follow-up, patients referred to multidisciplinary low-vision services had lower scores on the mobility subscale of the LVQOL than patients referred to optometric low-vision services [5.3 points; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2-10.5]. Paired sample t-tests for the two groups of patients taken together show improvement for the VCM1 (3.1 points; 95% CI: 0.6-5.6) and deterioration for the basic aspects of vision (3.5 points; 95% CI: 1.1-5.9) and the mobility (6.6 points; 95% CI: 3.7-9.5) subscales of the LVQOL. In conclusion, people referred to optometric services showed less deterioration in mobility than those referred to multidisciplinary services. No differences were observed for any of the other subscales of the LVQOL and the VCM1. Future research in this field should include randomized controlled designs comparing low-vision services with no treatment or placebo. © 2006 The College of Optometrists.

AB - Consecutive patients (n = 215) who were referred to optometric (55%) or multidisciplinary (45%) low-vision services and above 50 years of age were recruited from four hospitals in the Netherlands. They completed two vision-related quality of life questionnaires, the Vision Quality of Life Core Measure (VCM1) and the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire (LVQOL), before their first visit with low-vision services and 1 year later. At follow-up, patients referred to multidisciplinary low-vision services had lower scores on the mobility subscale of the LVQOL than patients referred to optometric low-vision services [5.3 points; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2-10.5]. Paired sample t-tests for the two groups of patients taken together show improvement for the VCM1 (3.1 points; 95% CI: 0.6-5.6) and deterioration for the basic aspects of vision (3.5 points; 95% CI: 1.1-5.9) and the mobility (6.6 points; 95% CI: 3.7-9.5) subscales of the LVQOL. In conclusion, people referred to optometric services showed less deterioration in mobility than those referred to multidisciplinary services. No differences were observed for any of the other subscales of the LVQOL and the VCM1. Future research in this field should include randomized controlled designs comparing low-vision services with no treatment or placebo. © 2006 The College of Optometrists.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00424.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00424.x

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 535

EP - 544

JO - Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

JF - Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

SN - 0275-5408

IS - 6

ER -