TY - JOUR
T1 - Surestimation de la prévalence de la dépression du postpartum selon une version en 5 items de l’EDPE
T2 - Une revue systématique et une méta-analyse des données individuelles des participants
AU - Thombs, Brett D.
AU - Levis, Brooke
AU - Lyubenova, Anita
AU - Neupane, Dipika
AU - Negeri, Zelalem
AU - Wu, Yin
AU - Sun, Ying
AU - He, Chen
AU - Krishnan, Ankur
AU - Vigod, Simone N.
AU - Bhandari, Parash Mani
AU - Imran, Mahrukh
AU - Rice, Danielle B.
AU - Azar, Marleine
AU - Chiovitti, Matthew J.
AU - Saadat, Nazanin
AU - Riehm, Kira E.
AU - Boruff, Jill T.
AU - Cuijpers, Pim
AU - Gilbody, Simon
AU - Ioannidis, John P.A.
AU - Kloda, Lorie A.
AU - Patten, Scott B.
AU - Shrier, Ian
AU - Ziegelstein, Roy C.
AU - Comeau, Liane
AU - Mitchell, Nicholas D.
AU - Tonelli, Marcello
AU - Barnes, Jacqueline
AU - Beck, Cheryl Tatano
AU - Bindt, Carola
AU - Figueiredo, Barbara
AU - Helle, Nadine
AU - Howard, Louise M.
AU - Kohlhoff, Jane
AU - Kozinszky, Zoltán
AU - Leonardou, Angeliki A.
AU - Radoš, Sandra Nakić
AU - Quispel, Chantal
AU - Rochat, Tamsen J.
AU - Stein, Alan
AU - Stewart, Robert C.
AU - Tadinac, Meri
AU - Tandon, S. Darius
AU - Tendais, Iva
AU - Töreki, Annamária
AU - Tran, Thach D.
AU - Trevillion, Kylee
AU - Turner, Katherine
AU - Vega-Dienstmaier, Johann M.
AU - Benedetti, Andrea
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Objective: The Maternal Mental Health in Canada, 2018/2019, survey reported that 18% of 7,085 mothers who recently gave birth reported “feelings consistent with postpartum depression” based on scores ≥7 on a 5-item version of the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS-5). The EPDS-5 was designed as a screening questionnaire, not to classify disorders or estimate prevalence; the extent to which EPDS-5 results reflect depression prevalence is unknown. We investigated EPDS-5 ≥7 performance relative to major depression prevalence based on a validated diagnostic interview, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID). Methods: We searched Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science Core Collection through June 2016 for studies with data sets with item response data to calculate EPDS-5 scores and that used the SCID to ascertain depression status. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis to estimate pooled percentage of EPDS-5 ≥7, pooled SCID major depression prevalence, and the pooled difference in prevalence. Results: A total of 3,958 participants from 19 primary studies were included. Pooled prevalence of SCID major depression was 9.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0% to 13.7%), pooled percentage of participants with EPDS-5 ≥7 was 16.2% (95% CI 10.7% to 23.8%), and pooled difference was 8.0% (95% CI 2.9% to 13.2%). In the 19 included studies, mean and median ratios of EPDS-5 to SCID prevalence were 2.1 and 1.4 times. Conclusions: Prevalence estimated based on EPDS-5 ≥7 appears to be substantially higher than the prevalence of major depression. Validated diagnostic interviews should be used to establish prevalence.
AB - Objective: The Maternal Mental Health in Canada, 2018/2019, survey reported that 18% of 7,085 mothers who recently gave birth reported “feelings consistent with postpartum depression” based on scores ≥7 on a 5-item version of the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS-5). The EPDS-5 was designed as a screening questionnaire, not to classify disorders or estimate prevalence; the extent to which EPDS-5 results reflect depression prevalence is unknown. We investigated EPDS-5 ≥7 performance relative to major depression prevalence based on a validated diagnostic interview, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID). Methods: We searched Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science Core Collection through June 2016 for studies with data sets with item response data to calculate EPDS-5 scores and that used the SCID to ascertain depression status. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis to estimate pooled percentage of EPDS-5 ≥7, pooled SCID major depression prevalence, and the pooled difference in prevalence. Results: A total of 3,958 participants from 19 primary studies were included. Pooled prevalence of SCID major depression was 9.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0% to 13.7%), pooled percentage of participants with EPDS-5 ≥7 was 16.2% (95% CI 10.7% to 23.8%), and pooled difference was 8.0% (95% CI 2.9% to 13.2%). In the 19 included studies, mean and median ratios of EPDS-5 to SCID prevalence were 2.1 and 1.4 times. Conclusions: Prevalence estimated based on EPDS-5 ≥7 appears to be substantially higher than the prevalence of major depression. Validated diagnostic interviews should be used to establish prevalence.
KW - epidemiology
KW - evidence-based medicine
KW - obstetrics and gynecology
KW - psychiatry
KW - statistics and research methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093952352&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85093952352&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0706743720934959
DO - 10.1177/0706743720934959
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33104415
AN - SCOPUS:85093952352
VL - 65
SP - 835
EP - 844
JO - Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
JF - Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
SN - 0706-7437
IS - 12
ER -