“Page after page I thought, that's the way it is”: Academic knowledge and the making of the 'islam debate' in the Netherlands

Martijn de Koning, Thijl Sunier

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this 'Current Debate' article, we discuss the entanglement of academic discourse and public debates on Islam and Muslims in the Netherlands. Academic output is a crucial but complex constituent of that debate. Many academics write policy reports, or take part in the debate through the media, and, whether they like it or not, their regular work is often co-opted by one of the discursive communities that take part in the debate. Research on Islam and Muslims is thus entangled with predominating knowledge regimes and policy priorities. We discuss several Dutch publications of the last three decades, and three recent books in particular, in order to show this entanglement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-112
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Muslims in Europe
Volume10
Issue number1
Early online date23 Dec 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

Keywords

  • Counterpublics
  • Muslim question
  • Policy principles
  • Regimes of knowledge
  • The Netherlands

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Page after page I thought, that's the way it is”: Academic knowledge and the making of the 'islam debate' in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this