Panel composition as pathway to impact: do wee need stakeholders expertise to select relevant mission-oriented projects?

Peter van den Besselaar, Ulf Sandström

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It is often argued that the presence of stakeholders in review panels may improve the selection of societal relevant research projects. In this paper, we investigate whether the composition of panels indeed matters. More precisely, when stakeholders are in the panel, does that result in more positive evaluation of proposals of relevance to that stakeholder? We investigate this for the gender issues domain, and show that this is the case. When stakeholders are present, the relevant projects obtain a more positive evaluation and consequently a higher score. If these findings can be generalised, they are an important insight for the creation of pathways to and conditions for impact.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-73
Number of pages6
Journalfteval journal for research and technology policy evaluation
Volume48
Early online date1 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Bibliographical note

Journal Issue 48, July 2019: Proceedings of the Conference „Impact of Social Sciences and Humanities for a European research Agenda Valuation of SSH in mission-oriented research! Vienna 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Panel composition as pathway to impact: do wee need stakeholders expertise to select relevant mission-oriented projects?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this