Abstract
Although research has been performed on participatory mechanisms in science and technology such as brokering, little seems written on intermediary organizations, e.g. science museums, taking up and embedding a participation brokerage role and systemic factors influencing these. This paper presents a qualitative case study in which six different intermediary organizations developed their participation brokerage role in a European RRI project. We demonstrate how structuring factors in the project context, the intermediary organization and the broader systemic context influenced the participation brokerage role take-up and embedding. Our findings yield implications for future capacity building endeavors among participation brokers in the making.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | A01 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-24 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Journal of Science Communication |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 17 Jan 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Participation and science governance
- Professionalism
- Professional development and training in science communication
- and trainPublic engagement with science and technology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Participation brokers in the making: Intermediaries taking up and embedding a new role at the science-society interface'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver