TY - CHAP
T1 - Party-groups and ideological cleavages in the European Parliament after the 2019 elections
AU - Crum, Ben
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Before the elections of May 2019, Eurosceptic populists were expected to make significant gains at the expense of the established party groups in the European Parliament. That would make the parliament much more polarized, undermining the consensus orientation that usually characterizes its proceedings. This chapter considers the outcome of the elections and its response to the nomination of Ursula von der Leyen for Commission President to examine whether these expectations have been borne out. Certainly, for the first time, the combined seat share of the two biggest groups, EPP and S&D, fell below 50 per cent and the extreme right Eurosceptics of the ID group did grow in size. Also, the election process of the new Commission President suggested that the new European Parliament may indeed rely on more floating coalitions. Still, once the Commission is in place, decision-making is expected to continue to be run by a broadly pro-integration coalition. The Eurosceptic opponents remain far removed from constituting a blocking minority. As the established groups in the political centre continue to command more than two-thirds of the seats, they remain at the heart of the consensus-building machine of the European Parliament.
AB - Before the elections of May 2019, Eurosceptic populists were expected to make significant gains at the expense of the established party groups in the European Parliament. That would make the parliament much more polarized, undermining the consensus orientation that usually characterizes its proceedings. This chapter considers the outcome of the elections and its response to the nomination of Ursula von der Leyen for Commission President to examine whether these expectations have been borne out. Certainly, for the first time, the combined seat share of the two biggest groups, EPP and S&D, fell below 50 per cent and the extreme right Eurosceptics of the ID group did grow in size. Also, the election process of the new Commission President suggested that the new European Parliament may indeed rely on more floating coalitions. Still, once the Commission is in place, decision-making is expected to continue to be run by a broadly pro-integration coalition. The Eurosceptic opponents remain far removed from constituting a blocking minority. As the established groups in the political centre continue to command more than two-thirds of the seats, they remain at the heart of the consensus-building machine of the European Parliament.
KW - European Parliament
KW - party groups
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101837079&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101837079&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.routledge.com/Assessing-the-2019-European-Parliament-Elections/Kritzinger-Plescia-Raube-Wilhelm-Wouters/p/book/9780367365936
U2 - 10.4324/9780367816926-6
DO - 10.4324/9780367816926-6
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85101837079
SN - 9780367365936
T3 - Routledge/UACES Contemporary European Studies
SP - 54
EP - 65
BT - Assessing the 2019 European Parliament Elections
A2 - Kritzinger, Sylvia
A2 - Plescia, Carolina
A2 - Raube, Kolja
A2 - Willem, James
A2 - Wouters, Jan
PB - Routledge
CY - London
ER -