Abstract
The combination of integrative passive sampling and bioassays is a promising approach for monitoring the toxicity of polar organic contaminants in aquatic environments. However, the design of integrative passive samplers can affect the accumulation of compounds and therewith the bioassay responses. The present study aimed to determine the effects of sampler housing and sorbent type on the number of chemical features accumulated in polar passive samplers and the subsequent bioassay responses to extracts of these samplers. To this end, four integrative passive sampler configurations, resulting from the combination of polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS) and Speedisk housings with hydrophilic-lipophilic balance and hydrophilic divinylbenzene sorbents, were simultaneously exposed at reference and contaminated surface water locations. The passive sampler extracts were subjected to chemical non-target screening and a battery of five bioassays. Extracts from POCIS contained a higher number of chemical features and caused higher bioassay responses in 91% of cases, while the two sorbents accumulated similar numbers of features and caused equally frequent but different bioassay responses. Hence, the passive sampler design critically affected the number of accumulated polar organic contaminants as well as their toxicity, highlighting the importance of passive sampler design for effect-based water quality assessment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 124488 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-10 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Environmental Pollution |
| Volume | 357 |
| Early online date | 1 Jul 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Sept 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Authors
Funding
The authors thank Eline Reus, Peter Cenijn, Nienke Wieringa, and Gea van der Lee for their assistance with the experimental work, Floris van der Burght for the graphical design of Fig. 1, and Kees van Gestel for kindly providing working space during the preparation of the manuscript. This work is part of the research program \u2018Smart Monitoring\u2019 with project number 443.324, financed by the Foundation for Applied Water Research (STOWA, The Netherlands). The authors thank Eline Reus, Peter Cenijn, Nienke Wieringa, and Gea van der Lee for their assistance with the experimental work, Floris van der Burght for the graphical design of Figure 1 , and Kees van Gestel for kindly providing working space during the preparation of the manuscript. This work is part of the research program \u2018Smart Monitoring\u2019 with project number 443.324, financed by the Foundation for Applied Water Research (STOWA, The Netherlands).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Stichting Toegepast Onderzoek Waterbeheer | |
| Foundation for Applied Water Research | |
| Kees van Gestel | 443.324 |
Keywords
- Effect-based monitoring
- Integrative sampling
- Non-target screening
- Polar organic contaminants
- Water quality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Passive sampler housing and sorbent type determine aquatic micropollutant adsorption and subsequent bioassay responses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver