Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Patriarchal power as a conceptual tool for gender history

  • Bob Pierik

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The concept ‘patriarchy’ has endured decline in use by historians despite calls for its redemption. One of the main reasons is that uses of ‘patriarchy’ fall into potentially clashing categories: There are theories of ‘patriarchy’ as hierarchical authority in the family and there are theories of ‘patriarchy’ as a ubiquitous or universal structure through which men dominate women. I suggest that the first is more useful because it allows for a better historically situated understanding of patriarchal power. Yet, patriarchy as hierarchical authority is less applicable as a toolbox to understand gender history diachronically, something patriarchy as universal structure aspired to, and a project that we should not abandon along with the abandonment of patriarchy as universal structure. Instead, I argue for an understanding of patriarchal power as something that can help us think about how gendered bodies move through time. By turning more explicitly to the way in which patriarchal power appropriates the body and claims natural and universal status, it can be a potential conceptual tool in the historian’s toolbox that helps us address the challenge of diachronic history of gendered bodies without resorting to a biological essentialism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-92
Number of pages22
JournalRethinking History
Volume26
Issue number1
Early online date10 Feb 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Funding

This work was supported by the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek [276-69-007]. Parts of this article have appeared as the thesis ‘A History of Patriarchy?’ written to obtain the degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy, Politics and Economics at Leiden University. Furthermore, this article has benefited massively from the comments, questions and insights of Glen Newey, Geertje Mak, Frank Chouraqui, Marleen Reichgelt and the anonymous reviewers of Rethinking History. The research for this work was also carried out as part of the research program ‘The Freedom of the Streets. Gender and Urban Space in Europe and Asia (1600–1850)’ with project number 276-69-007, financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). This article is dedicated to the memory of professor Glen Newey who supervised the research for this contribution until he unexpectedly passed away. Parts of this article have appeared as the thesis ‘A History of Patriarchy?’ written to obtain the degree of Master of Arts in Philosophy, Politics and Economics at Leiden University. Furthermore, this article has benefited massively from the comments, questions and insights of Glen Newey, Geertje Mak, Frank Chouraqui, Marleen Reichgelt and the anonymous reviewers of Rethinking History. The research for this work was also carried out as part of the research program ‘The Freedom of the Streets. Gender and Urban Space in Europe and Asia (1600–1850)’ with project number 276-69-007, financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). This article is dedicated to the memory of professor Glen Newey who supervised the research for this contribution until he unexpectedly passed away.

FundersFunder number
Universiteit Leiden1600–1850
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek276-69-007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Patriarchal power as a conceptual tool for gender history'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this