Pearson's Statistics in the Netherlands and the Astronomer Kapteyn

I.H. Stamhuis, E. Seneta

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In 1903 the well-known Dutch astronomer Kapteyn published a paper in which he discussed statistical methods which he thought would be relevant for biologists. His motivation was the 1895 paper of Pearson on skew-frequency curves. Kapteyn had concluded that the theory was open to grave objections and was not adapted to nonmathematical readers. He was then led to an independent investigation of the subject. This publication would lead to a heated dialogue between Kapteyn and Pearson, in which they accused each other of inappropriate starting points, of plagiarism and of making serious mathematical mistakes. This article evaluates these claims. In addition, Kapteyn's struggle to make his work accessible to biologists is discussed. © 2009 The Author. Journal compilation © 2009 International Statistical Institute. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-111
JournalInternational Statistical Review
Volume77
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Compilation
Statistical method
Skew
Statistics
Curve
Evaluate
Dialogue
Plagiarism
Roads
Statistical methods
The Netherlands

Cite this

@article{ace333253a3447e091265f0735ea335f,
title = "Pearson's Statistics in the Netherlands and the Astronomer Kapteyn",
abstract = "In 1903 the well-known Dutch astronomer Kapteyn published a paper in which he discussed statistical methods which he thought would be relevant for biologists. His motivation was the 1895 paper of Pearson on skew-frequency curves. Kapteyn had concluded that the theory was open to grave objections and was not adapted to nonmathematical readers. He was then led to an independent investigation of the subject. This publication would lead to a heated dialogue between Kapteyn and Pearson, in which they accused each other of inappropriate starting points, of plagiarism and of making serious mathematical mistakes. This article evaluates these claims. In addition, Kapteyn's struggle to make his work accessible to biologists is discussed. {\circledC} 2009 The Author. Journal compilation {\circledC} 2009 International Statistical Institute. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.",
author = "I.H. Stamhuis and E. Seneta",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1111/j.1751-5823.2009.00072.x",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "96--111",
journal = "International Statistical Review",
issn = "0306-7734",
publisher = "International Statistical Institute",

}

Pearson's Statistics in the Netherlands and the Astronomer Kapteyn. / Stamhuis, I.H.; Seneta, E.

In: International Statistical Review, Vol. 77, 2009, p. 96-111.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pearson's Statistics in the Netherlands and the Astronomer Kapteyn

AU - Stamhuis, I.H.

AU - Seneta, E.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - In 1903 the well-known Dutch astronomer Kapteyn published a paper in which he discussed statistical methods which he thought would be relevant for biologists. His motivation was the 1895 paper of Pearson on skew-frequency curves. Kapteyn had concluded that the theory was open to grave objections and was not adapted to nonmathematical readers. He was then led to an independent investigation of the subject. This publication would lead to a heated dialogue between Kapteyn and Pearson, in which they accused each other of inappropriate starting points, of plagiarism and of making serious mathematical mistakes. This article evaluates these claims. In addition, Kapteyn's struggle to make his work accessible to biologists is discussed. © 2009 The Author. Journal compilation © 2009 International Statistical Institute. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.

AB - In 1903 the well-known Dutch astronomer Kapteyn published a paper in which he discussed statistical methods which he thought would be relevant for biologists. His motivation was the 1895 paper of Pearson on skew-frequency curves. Kapteyn had concluded that the theory was open to grave objections and was not adapted to nonmathematical readers. He was then led to an independent investigation of the subject. This publication would lead to a heated dialogue between Kapteyn and Pearson, in which they accused each other of inappropriate starting points, of plagiarism and of making serious mathematical mistakes. This article evaluates these claims. In addition, Kapteyn's struggle to make his work accessible to biologists is discussed. © 2009 The Author. Journal compilation © 2009 International Statistical Institute. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2009.00072.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2009.00072.x

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 96

EP - 111

JO - International Statistical Review

JF - International Statistical Review

SN - 0306-7734

ER -