Personal scoping review: A novel review type with a personal touch

Frank Lobbezoo, Karen G. Raphael, Merel C. Verhoeff*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalComment / Letter to the editorAcademic

Abstract

Background: The importance of incorporating patient and medical professional perspectives in medical research is increasingly recognized. However, formal platforms for these voices are limited. Objective: To address this gap, this study proposes a novel manuscript type, the Personal Scoping Review, within the Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. Materials and Methods: Personal Scoping Reviews utilize a qualitative design with semi-structured interviews to gather patient and professional perspectives. This approach offers flexibility and depth, allowing authors to explore diverse insights. The reviews focus on care, education and research agendas related to the topic, using the voices of individuals as primary evidence. Results & Conclusion: Personal Scoping Reviews highlight concerns in patient care, educational needs and research gaps, offering a comprehensive view. By integrating diverse perspectives, these reviews provide valuable insights for improving medical research and practice. They facilitate the formulation of agendas to address key issues in care, education and research. By amplifying individual perspectives, these reviews aim to enhance the relevance and impact of research, ultimately benefiting patients and healthcare providers alike.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1932-1933
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
Volume51
Issue number9
Early online date12 May 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • expert opinion
  • scoping review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Personal scoping review: A novel review type with a personal touch'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this