Abstract
Restoration of the orbit is the first and most predictable step in the surgical treatment of orbital fractures. Orbital reconstruction is keyhole surgery performed in a confined space. A technology-supported workflow called computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has become the standard for complex orbital traumatology in many hospitals. CAS technology has catalyzed the incorporation of personalized medicine in orbital reconstruction. The complete workflow consists of diagnostics, planning, surgery and evaluation. Advanced diagnostics and virtual surgical planning are techniques utilized in the preoperative phase to optimally prepare for surgery and adapt the treatment to the patient. Further personalization of the treatment is possible if reconstruction is performed with a patient-specific implant and several design options are available to tailor the implant to individual needs. Intraoperatively, visual appraisal is used to assess the obtained implant position. Surgical navigation, intraoperative imaging, and specific PSI design options are able to enhance feedback in the CAS workflow. Evaluation of the surgical result can be performed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Throughout the entire workflow, the concepts of CAS and personalized medicine are intertwined. A combination of the techniques may be applied in order to achieve the most optimal clinical outcome. The goal of this article is to provide a complete overview of the workflow for post-traumatic orbital reconstruction, with an in-depth description of the available personalization and CAS options.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 1366 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-16 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Journal of personalized medicine |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 24 Aug 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Special Issue: 3D Innovations in Personalized Surgery.Funding Information:
Funding for this research was received by KLS Martin and Brainlab AG. None of the funding parties had any involvement in the contents or decision to submit the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.
Funding
Funding for this research was received by KLS Martin and Brainlab AG. None of the funding parties had any involvement in the contents or decision to submit the manuscript.
Keywords
- additive manufacturing
- computer-assisted surgery
- orbital reconstruction
- patient-specific implants
- surgical navigation