Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pharma-cartography: Navigating the complexities of antibiotic supply to rural livestock in West Bengal, India, through value chain and power dynamic analysis

  • Mathew Hennessey
  • , Ayako Ebata
  • , Indranil Samanta
  • , Ana Mateus
  • , Jean-Christophe Arnold
  • , Dominic Day
  • , Meenakshi Gautham
  • , Pablo Alarcon

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance threatens provision of healthcare and livestock production worldwide with predicted negative socioeconomic impact. Antibiotic stewardship can be considered of importance to people living in rural communities, many of which depend on agriculture as a source of food and income and rely on antibiotics to control infectious diseases in livestock. Consequently, there is a need for clarity of the structure of antibiotic value chains to understand the complexity of antibiotic production and distribution in community settings as this will facilitate the development of effective policies and interventions. We used a value chain approach to investigate how relationships, behaviours, and influences are established during antibiotic distribution. Interviews were conducted with key informants (n = 17), value chain stakeholders (n = 22), and livestock keeping households (n = 36) in Kolkata, and two rural sites in West Bengal, India. Value chain mapping and an assessment of power dynamics, using manifest content analysis, were conducted to investigate antibiotic distribution and identify entry points for antibiotic stewardship. The flow of antibiotics from manufacturer to stockists is described and mapped and two local level maps showing distribution to final consumers presented. The maps illustrate that antibiotic distribution occurred through numerous formal and informal routes, many of which circumvent antibiotic use legislation. This was partly due to limited institutional power of the public sector to govern value chain activities. A ‘veterinary service lacuna’ existed resulting in livestock keepers having higher reliance on private and informal providers, who often lacked legal mandates to prescribe and dispense antibiotics. The illegitimacy of many antibiotic prescribers blocked access to formal training who instead relied on mimicking the behaviour of more experienced prescribers–who also lacked access to stewardship guidelines. We argue that limited institutional power to enforce existing antibiotic legislation and guide antibiotic usage and major gaps in livestock healthcare services make attempts to curb informal prescribing unsustainable. Alternative options could include addressing public sector deficits, with respect to both healthcare services and antibiotic provision, and by providing resources such as locally relevant antibiotic guidelines to all antibiotic prescribers. In addition, legitimacy of informal prescribers could be revised, which may allow formation of associations or groups to incentivise good antibiotic practices.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0281188
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume18
Issue number2 February
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2023
Externally publishedYes

Funding

Financial support for this study was obtained through a Health Systems Research Initiative grant (Ref: MR/S013598/1) awarded to MG jointly funded by the Medical Research Council, the Economic and Social Research Council, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and Welcome Trust, UK. This work was also partially funded by, and is a contribution to, the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture and Nutrition for Health (A4NH). The opinions expressed here belong to the authors, and do not necessarily reflect those of A4NH or CGIAR. The primary author’s Bloomsbury PhD studentship is provided by the Royal Veterinary College (RVC) through a Bloomsbury Colleges collaboration with the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), and research grants from the London Centre for Integrative Research and Agriculture and Health (LCIRAH) to the RVC, the MRC funded project ‘A multi-stakeholder approach towards operationalising antibiotic stewardship in India’s pluralistic rural health system’ (Grant No. MR/S013589/1) awarded to LSHTM, and the UKRI GCRF One Health Poultry Hub (Grant No. BB/ S011269/1) awarded to the RVC - one of 12 interdisciplinary research hubs funded under the UK government’s Global Challenges Research Fund Interdisciplinary Research Hub initiative. For J-C.A and D.D, this work formed part of their MSc research projects for which internal funding was received from their respective institutions; the Royal Veterinary College (RVC) and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM). The funders had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, or in manuscript preparation or decision to publish the results. The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions made by our colleagues in West Bengal for their support during this study with particular mention to the staff at the Liver Foundation. We would also like to acknowledge Dr Gerry Bloom and Dr Catherine Goodman for their guidance in conducting the study and subsequent data analysis.

FundersFunder number
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Economic and Social Research Council
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Charitable Trust
London Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture and Health
UK Research and Innovation
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilBB/S011269/1
Medical Research CouncilMR/S013589/1, MR/S013598/1

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Pharma-cartography: Navigating the complexities of antibiotic supply to rural livestock in West Bengal, India, through value chain and power dynamic analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this