TY - JOUR
T1 - Photovoice in research involving people with intellectual disabilities
T2 - A guided photovoice approach as an alternative
AU - Overmars-Marx, Tessa
AU - Thomése, Fleur
AU - Moonen, Xavier
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Background: In studies involving people with intellectual disabilities, photovoice is increasingly used to include the voice of participants. Analysing existing literature, the present authors found that photovoice was used in various forms with different outcomes. These studies describe both obstructing and facilitating factors. The present authors designed a more standardized approach of photovoice and developed an alternative strategy: “guided photovoice.”. Method: The “guided photovoice” approach was tested on fourteen participants with intellectual disabilities. The outcomes of the approach were evaluated. Results: The effectiveness of the approach varied with the participants’ capabilities and needs. Some participants were talked more while taking photographs, others told their story easily during the interviews. The use of follow-up questions was helpful to deepen the interview. Conclusions: A more standardized, guided photovoice approach is a helpful addition to the various options for using photovoice; it is important to decide which approach best fits the needs and capabilities of the participants.
AB - Background: In studies involving people with intellectual disabilities, photovoice is increasingly used to include the voice of participants. Analysing existing literature, the present authors found that photovoice was used in various forms with different outcomes. These studies describe both obstructing and facilitating factors. The present authors designed a more standardized approach of photovoice and developed an alternative strategy: “guided photovoice.”. Method: The “guided photovoice” approach was tested on fourteen participants with intellectual disabilities. The outcomes of the approach were evaluated. Results: The effectiveness of the approach varied with the participants’ capabilities and needs. Some participants were talked more while taking photographs, others told their story easily during the interviews. The use of follow-up questions was helpful to deepen the interview. Conclusions: A more standardized, guided photovoice approach is a helpful addition to the various options for using photovoice; it is important to decide which approach best fits the needs and capabilities of the participants.
KW - guided photovoice
KW - people with intellectual disabilities
KW - photovoice
KW - walking interview
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010639762&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010639762&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jar.12329
DO - 10.1111/jar.12329
M3 - Article
SN - 1360-2322
VL - 31
SP - e92-e104
JO - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
JF - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
IS - 1
ER -