TY - JOUR
T1 - Physical Activity and Risk of Lymphoma: A Meta-Analysis
AU - Vermaete, N.V.H.
AU - Wolter, P.
AU - Verhoef, G.E.G.
AU - Kollen, B.J.
AU - Kwakkel, G.
AU - Schepers, L.
AU - Gosselink, R.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Background: Physical activity has a protective effect on some types of cancer. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to explore the literature on the association between physical activity and risk of lymphoma. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted for cohort and case-control studies examining the association between self-reported physical activity and risk of lymphoma. Depending on statistical heterogeneity, a random or fixed effects model was used to estimate the summary OR and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Seven case-control studies and 5 cohort studies were included. When data from both study designs were combined, no significant influence of physical activity on risk of lymphoma was found (pooled OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.79-1.02; P = 0.10). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant protective influence of physical activity on risk of lymphoma in case-control studies (pooled OR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.68-0.96; P = 0.02). In contrast, cohort studies, which have a higher level of evidence than case-control studies, confirm the results of the primary meta-analysis (pooled OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.88-1.19; P = 0.76). A subsequent subgroup analysis found no significant differences between results for Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (χ
AB - Background: Physical activity has a protective effect on some types of cancer. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to explore the literature on the association between physical activity and risk of lymphoma. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted for cohort and case-control studies examining the association between self-reported physical activity and risk of lymphoma. Depending on statistical heterogeneity, a random or fixed effects model was used to estimate the summary OR and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Seven case-control studies and 5 cohort studies were included. When data from both study designs were combined, no significant influence of physical activity on risk of lymphoma was found (pooled OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.79-1.02; P = 0.10). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant protective influence of physical activity on risk of lymphoma in case-control studies (pooled OR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.68-0.96; P = 0.02). In contrast, cohort studies, which have a higher level of evidence than case-control studies, confirm the results of the primary meta-analysis (pooled OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.88-1.19; P = 0.76). A subsequent subgroup analysis found no significant differences between results for Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (χ
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84880027687
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880027687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0182
DO - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0182
M3 - Article
SN - 1055-9965
VL - 22
SP - 1173
EP - 1184
JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
IS - 7
ER -