Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Physicists’ views on scientific realism

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Do physicists believe that general relativity is true, and that electrons and phonons exist, and if so, in what sense? To what extent does the spectrum of positions among physicists correspond to philosophical positions like scientific realism, instrumentalism, or perspectivism? Does agreement with these positions correlate with demographic factors, and are realist physicists more likely to support research projects purely aimed at increasing knowledge? We conducted a questionnaire study to scrutinize the philosophical stances of physicists. We received responses from 384 physicists and 151 philosophers. Our main findings are (1) On average, physicists tend toward scientific realism, and slightly more so than philosophers of science. (2) Physicists can be clustered into five groups. Three show variants of scientific realism, one is instrumentalist, and one seems undecided or incoherent. (3) Agreement with realism weakly correlates with approval of building a bigger particle collider. (4) Agreement with realism weakly correlates with the seniority of physicists. (5) We did not find correlations with other factors, such as whether physicists focus on theoretical or experimental research and whether they engage with applied or basic research.
Original languageEnglish
Article number10
JournalEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Science
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2024
Externally publishedYes

Funding

We thank Hasok Chang for helpful feedback on a previous draft of the manuscript and for providing funding for the voucher prizes. Thanks also go to Anna Alexandrova, Paolo Andrich, Hope Bretscher, Kai Freund, Lorenzo Perrone, and participants of Hasok Chang’s working group for their feedback on early versions of the questionnaire.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physicists’ views on scientific realism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this