Physiotherapists’ Experiences with the Hip Disability and Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Qualitative Interview Study

Dennis J. van den Berg*, Esther T. Maas, Rosa Lynn Edelaar, Mathijs B. Arendsen, Elizabeth J. de Louw, Henri Kiers, Thea P.M. Vliet Vlieland, Raymond W.J.G. Ostelo, Marianne H. Donker

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Clinical guidelines for physiotherapy following total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) recommend using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) like the Hip disability and Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS/KOOS). However, it remains unclear how physiotherapists use these PROMs in daily clinical practice. Objective: To explore primary care physiotherapists’ experiences with the HOOS/KOOS in daily clinical practice following THA and TKA. Methods: Thirteen physiotherapists in the Netherlands were recruited via convenience sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, which explored HOOS/KOOS use in clinical practice, administrative regulations, and applications beyond patient care, as well as think-aloud interviews to capture perceptions of the content of these PROMs and interpretations of hypothetical patient scores. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: The physiotherapists’ ages ranged from 25 to 54y, with annual THA/TKA volumes from 5 to 50 patients. Three themes emerged, as follows: (1) “Physiotherapists use the HOOS/KOOS for various purposes in daily clinical practice”, including complementing history taking and monitoring patient progress; (2) “Perceptions of the relevance of the HOOS/KOOS for daily clinical practice vary per item, domain, and version,” with items related to daily life activities and psychosocial factors being perceived as more valuable; and (3) “Practical aspects of HOOS/KOOS administration influence their use in daily clinical practice,” with electronic health records (EHRs) that facilitate PROM administration enhancing their use, while administrative regulations limit this. Conclusions: Physiotherapists experience HOOS/KOOS items related to daily life activities and psychosocial factors useful for history-taking and monitoring patient progress, particularly when embedded in EHRs that facilitate PROM administration.

Original languageEnglish
Article number992
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.

Funding

This publication is part of the Doctoral Grant for Teachers research programme with file number 023.021.045, which is financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO).

FundersFunder number
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

    Keywords

    • HOOS
    • KOOS
    • physiotherapy
    • PROMs
    • thematic analysis
    • total hip arthroplasty
    • total knee arthroplasty

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Physiotherapists’ Experiences with the Hip Disability and Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Qualitative Interview Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this