TY - GEN
T1 - Pitch spelling
T2 - 4th Sound and Music Computing Conference, SMC 2007
AU - Honingh, Aline
PY - 2007/1/1
Y1 - 2007/1/1
N2 - Pitch spelling addresses the question of how to derive traditional score notation from pitch classes or MIDI numbers. In this paper, we motivate that the diatonic notes in a piece of music are easier to spell correctly than the non-diatonic notes. Then we investigate 1) whether the generally used method of calculating the proportion of correctly spelled notes to evaluate pitch spelling models can be replaced by a method that concentrates only on the nondiatonic pitches, and 2) if an extra evaluation measure to distinguish the incorrectly spelled diatonic notes from the incorrectly spelled non-diatonic notes would be useful. To this end, we calculate the typical percentage of pitch classes that correspond to diatonic notes and check whether those pitch classes do indeed refer to diatonic notes in a piece of music. We explore extensions of the diatonic set. Finally, a good performing pitch spelling algorithm is investigated to see what percentage of its incorrectly spelled notes are diatonic notes. It turns out that a substantial part of the incorrectly spelled notes consist of diatonic notes, which means that the standard evaluation measure of pitch spelling algorithms cannot be replaced by a measure that only concentrates on non-diatonic notes without losing important information.We propose instead that two evaluation measures could be added to the standard correctness rate to be able to give a more complete view of a pitch spelling model.
AB - Pitch spelling addresses the question of how to derive traditional score notation from pitch classes or MIDI numbers. In this paper, we motivate that the diatonic notes in a piece of music are easier to spell correctly than the non-diatonic notes. Then we investigate 1) whether the generally used method of calculating the proportion of correctly spelled notes to evaluate pitch spelling models can be replaced by a method that concentrates only on the nondiatonic pitches, and 2) if an extra evaluation measure to distinguish the incorrectly spelled diatonic notes from the incorrectly spelled non-diatonic notes would be useful. To this end, we calculate the typical percentage of pitch classes that correspond to diatonic notes and check whether those pitch classes do indeed refer to diatonic notes in a piece of music. We explore extensions of the diatonic set. Finally, a good performing pitch spelling algorithm is investigated to see what percentage of its incorrectly spelled notes are diatonic notes. It turns out that a substantial part of the incorrectly spelled notes consist of diatonic notes, which means that the standard evaluation measure of pitch spelling algorithms cannot be replaced by a measure that only concentrates on non-diatonic notes without losing important information.We propose instead that two evaluation measures could be added to the standard correctness rate to be able to give a more complete view of a pitch spelling model.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59649110001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59649110001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:59649110001
SN - 9789606608759
T3 - Proceedings of the 4th Sound and Music Computing Conference, SMC 2007
SP - 75
EP - 81
BT - Proceedings of the 4th Sound and Music Computing Conference, SMC 2007
PB - Sound and music Computing network
Y2 - 11 July 2007 through 13 July 2007
ER -