TY - JOUR
T1 - Planning for Emerging Infectious Disease Pandemics
T2 - Definitions, the Role of Planners, and Learning From the Avian Influenza Outbreak of 2004–2005
AU - Spencer, James Nguyen H.
AU - Marasco, David
AU - Eichinger, Michelle
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Planning Association, Chicago, IL.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Problem, research strategy, and findings: Planners have not paid enough attention to managing the risk of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs), of which COVID-19 is the most recent manifestation. Overlooking aggressive policies to manage this risk of zoonotic viruses reassorting between sick animals and humans misses the greatest opportunity for stopping future disease pandemics. In this study we review several disciplines, outline the scant planning literature on EIDs, and identify the increasing calls from virologists and medical professionals to address urbanization as a key EID driver. Using the case of avian influenza outbreaks in Vietnam in 2004 and 2005, we conceptualize a preventive planning approach to managing the risk of zoonotic transmission that results in EID pandemics. Takeaway for practice: We make several recommendations for planners. Practicing planners should consider how their plans manage the risk of zoonotic disease transmission between animals and humans through land use planning and community planning. Planning education and certification organizations should develop positions regarding the role of planning for EIDs. Food systems planners should consider the importance of livestock practices in food production as a risk factor for EIDs. Diverse research teams should combine geographic scales, data sources, and disciplinary knowledge to examine how an extended series of upstream and downstream events can result in a global pandemic. Such empirical examination can lead to effective planning policies to greatly reduce this risk.
AB - Problem, research strategy, and findings: Planners have not paid enough attention to managing the risk of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs), of which COVID-19 is the most recent manifestation. Overlooking aggressive policies to manage this risk of zoonotic viruses reassorting between sick animals and humans misses the greatest opportunity for stopping future disease pandemics. In this study we review several disciplines, outline the scant planning literature on EIDs, and identify the increasing calls from virologists and medical professionals to address urbanization as a key EID driver. Using the case of avian influenza outbreaks in Vietnam in 2004 and 2005, we conceptualize a preventive planning approach to managing the risk of zoonotic transmission that results in EID pandemics. Takeaway for practice: We make several recommendations for planners. Practicing planners should consider how their plans manage the risk of zoonotic disease transmission between animals and humans through land use planning and community planning. Planning education and certification organizations should develop positions regarding the role of planning for EIDs. Food systems planners should consider the importance of livestock practices in food production as a risk factor for EIDs. Diverse research teams should combine geographic scales, data sources, and disciplinary knowledge to examine how an extended series of upstream and downstream events can result in a global pandemic. Such empirical examination can lead to effective planning policies to greatly reduce this risk.
KW - desakota
KW - emerging infectious disease
KW - pandemics
KW - regional planning
KW - zoonotic disease
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111685515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111685515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01944363.2021.1930107
DO - 10.1080/01944363.2021.1930107
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85111685515
SN - 0194-4363
VL - 88
SP - 113
EP - 126
JO - Journal of the American Planning Association
JF - Journal of the American Planning Association
IS - 1
ER -