Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Point absorbers in Advanced LIGO

  • A.F. Brooks
  • , G. Vajente
  • , H. Yamamoto
  • , R. Abbott
  • , C. Adams
  • , R.X. Adhikari
  • , A. Ananyeva
  • , S. Appert
  • , K. Arai
  • , J.S. Areeda
  • , Y. Asali
  • , S.M. Aston
  • , C. Austin
  • , A.M. Baer
  • , M. Ball
  • , S.W. Ballmer
  • , S. Banagiri
  • , D. Barker
  • , L. Barsotti
  • , J. Bartlett
  • B.K. Berger, J. Betzwieser, D. Bhattacharjee, G. Billingsley, S. Biscans, C.D. Blair, R.M. Blair, N. Bode, P. Booker, R. Bork, A. Bramley, D.D. Brown, A. Buikema, C. Cahillane, K.C. Cannon, H.T. Cao, X. Chen, A.A. Ciobanu, F. Clara, C. Compton, S.J. Cooper, K.R. Corley, S.T. Countryman, P.B. Covas, D.C. Coyne, L.E. Datrier, D. Davis, C.D. Difronzo, K.L. Dooley, J.C. Driggers, P. Dupej, S.E. Dwyer, A. Effler, T. Etzel, M. Evans, T.M. Evans, J. Feicht, A. Fernandez-Galiana, P. Fritschel, V.V. Frolov, P. Fulda, M. Fyffe, J.A. Giaime, D.D. Giardina, P. Godwin, E. Goetz, S. Gras, C. Gray, R. Gray, A.C. Green, A. Gupta, E.K. Gustafson, D. Gustafson, E. Hall, J. Hanks, J. Hanson, T. Hardwick, R.K. Hasskew, M.C. Heintze, A.F. Helmling-Cornell, N.A. Holland, K. Izmui, W. Jia, J.D. Jones, S. Kandhasamy, S. Karki, M. Kasprzack, K. Kawabe, N. Kijbunchoo, P.J. King, J.S. Kissel, R. Kumar, M. Landry, B.B. Lane, B. Lantz, M. Laxen, Y.K. Lecoeuche, J. Leviton, L. Jian, M. Lormand, A.P. Lundgren, R. Macas, M. Macinnis, D.M. Macleod, G.L. Mansell, S. Marka, Z. Marka, D.V. Martynov, K. Mason, T.J. Massinger, F. Matichard, N. Mavalvala, R. McCarthy, D.E. McClelland, S. McCormick, L. McCuller, J. McIver, T. McRae, G. Mendell, K. Merfeld, E.L. Merilh, F. Meylahn, T. Mistry, R. Mittleman, G. Moreno, C.M. Mow-Lowry, S. Mozzon, A. Mullavey, T.J. Nelson, P. Nguyen, L.K. Nuttall, J. Oberling, R.J. Oram, C. Osthelder, D.J. Ottaway, H. Overmier, J.R. Palamos, W. Parker, E. Payne, A. Pele, R. Penhorwood, C.J. Perez, M. Pirello, H. Radkins, K.E. Ramirez, J.W. Richardson, K. Riles, N.A. Robertson, J.G. Rollins, C.L. Romel, J.H. Romie, M.P. Ross, K. Ryan, T. Sadecki, E.J. Sanchez, L.E. Sanchez, S.R. Tiruppatturrajamanikkam, R.L. Savage, D. Schaetzl, R. Schnabel, R.M. Schofield, E. Schwartz, D. Sellers, T. Shaffer, D. Sigg, B.J. Slagmolen, J.R. Smith, S. Soni, B. Sorazu, A.P. Spencer, K.A. Strain, L. Sun, M.J. Szczepanczyk, M. Thomas, P. Thomas, K.A. Thorne, K. Toland, C.I. Torrie, G. Traylor, M. Tse, A.L. Urban, G. Valdes, D.C. Vander-Hyde, P.J. Veitch, K. Venkateswara, G. Venugopalan, A.D. Viets, T. Vo, C. Vorvick, M. Wade, R.L. Ward, J. Warner, B. Weaver, R. Weiss, C. Whittle, B. Willke, C.C. Wipf, L. Xiao, H. Yu, H. Yu, L. Zhang, M.E. Zucker, J. Zweizig

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Small, highly absorbing points are randomly present on the surfaces of the main interferometer optics in Advanced LIGO. The resulting nanometer scale thermo-elastic deformations and substrate lenses from these micron-scale absorbers significantly reduce the sensitivity of the interferometer directly though a reduction in the power-recycling gain and indirect interactions with the feedback control system. We review the expected surface deformation from point absorbers and provide a pedagogical description of the impact on power buildup in second generation gravitational wave detectors (dual-recycled Fabry–Perot Michelson interferometers). This analysis predicts that the power-dependent reduction in interferometer performance will significantly degrade maximum stored power by up to 50% and, hence, limit GW sensitivity, but it suggests system wide corrections that can be implemented in current and future GW detectors. This is particularly pressing given that future GW detectors call for an order of magnitude more stored power than currently used in Advanced LIGO in Observing Run 3. We briefly review strategies to mitigate the effects of point absorbers in current and future GW wave detectors to maximize the success of these enterprises.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4047-4063
Number of pages17
JournalApplied Optics
Volume60
Issue number13
Early online date30 Apr 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

© 2021 Optical Society of America.

Funding

Acknowledgment. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the United States National Science Foundation (NSF) for the construction and operation of the LIGO Laboratory and aLIGO as well as the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) of the United Kingdom, and the Max-Planck-Society (MPS) for support of the construction of aLIGO. Additional support for aLIGO was provided by the Australian Research Council. The authors acknowledge the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Fellows program for additional support. LIGO was constructed by the California Institute of Technology and Massachusetts Institute of Technology with funding from the NSF, and operates under cooperative agreement PHY-1764464. aLIGO was built under award PHY-0823459. This paper carries LIGO Document Number LIGO-P1900287.

FundersFunder number
Australian Research Council
Medical Research Council
California Institute of Technology and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Science and Technology Facilities CouncilST/V00154X/1, ST/V001337/1, ST/V001736/1
National Science Foundation1764464, PHY-1764464

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Point absorbers in Advanced LIGO'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this