Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election

Daniel Balliet, Joshua M. Tybur, Junhui Wu, Christian Antonellis, Paul A.M. Van Lange

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Theories suggest that political ideology relates to cooperation, with conservatives being more likely to pursue selfish outcomes, and liberals more likely to pursue egalitarian outcomes. In study 1, we examine how political ideology and political party affiliation (Republican vs. Democrat) predict cooperation with a partner who self-identifies as Republican or Democrat in two samples before (n = 362) and after (n = 366) the 2012 US presidential election. Liberals show slightly more concern for their partners’ outcomes compared to conservatives (study 1), and in study 2 this relation is supported by a meta-analysis (r =.15). However, in study 1, political ideology did not relate to cooperation in general. Both Republicans and Democrats extend more cooperation to their in-group relative to the out-group, and this is explained by expectations of cooperation from in-group versus out-group members. We discuss the relation between political ideology and cooperation within and between groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)797-818
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of conflict resolution
Volume62
Issue number4
Early online date21 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

political ideology
election
Group
outgroup
presidential election
group membership
Favoritism
Political ideology
Elections

Keywords

  • cooperation
  • in-group favoritism
  • political ideology
  • right-wing authoritarianism
  • social dominance orientation
  • trust

Cite this

@article{72401569d2ab494dac9b863fbcb48113,
title = "Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election",
abstract = "Theories suggest that political ideology relates to cooperation, with conservatives being more likely to pursue selfish outcomes, and liberals more likely to pursue egalitarian outcomes. In study 1, we examine how political ideology and political party affiliation (Republican vs. Democrat) predict cooperation with a partner who self-identifies as Republican or Democrat in two samples before (n = 362) and after (n = 366) the 2012 US presidential election. Liberals show slightly more concern for their partners’ outcomes compared to conservatives (study 1), and in study 2 this relation is supported by a meta-analysis (r =.15). However, in study 1, political ideology did not relate to cooperation in general. Both Republicans and Democrats extend more cooperation to their in-group relative to the out-group, and this is explained by expectations of cooperation from in-group versus out-group members. We discuss the relation between political ideology and cooperation within and between groups.",
keywords = "cooperation, in-group favoritism, political ideology, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, trust",
author = "Daniel Balliet and Tybur, {Joshua M.} and Junhui Wu and Christian Antonellis and {Van Lange}, {Paul A.M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022002716658694",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "797--818",
journal = "The Journal of Conflict Resolution",
issn = "0022-0027",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election. / Balliet, Daniel; Tybur, Joshua M.; Wu, Junhui; Antonellis, Christian; Van Lange, Paul A.M.

In: Journal of conflict resolution, Vol. 62, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 797-818.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election

AU - Balliet, Daniel

AU - Tybur, Joshua M.

AU - Wu, Junhui

AU - Antonellis, Christian

AU - Van Lange, Paul A.M.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Theories suggest that political ideology relates to cooperation, with conservatives being more likely to pursue selfish outcomes, and liberals more likely to pursue egalitarian outcomes. In study 1, we examine how political ideology and political party affiliation (Republican vs. Democrat) predict cooperation with a partner who self-identifies as Republican or Democrat in two samples before (n = 362) and after (n = 366) the 2012 US presidential election. Liberals show slightly more concern for their partners’ outcomes compared to conservatives (study 1), and in study 2 this relation is supported by a meta-analysis (r =.15). However, in study 1, political ideology did not relate to cooperation in general. Both Republicans and Democrats extend more cooperation to their in-group relative to the out-group, and this is explained by expectations of cooperation from in-group versus out-group members. We discuss the relation between political ideology and cooperation within and between groups.

AB - Theories suggest that political ideology relates to cooperation, with conservatives being more likely to pursue selfish outcomes, and liberals more likely to pursue egalitarian outcomes. In study 1, we examine how political ideology and political party affiliation (Republican vs. Democrat) predict cooperation with a partner who self-identifies as Republican or Democrat in two samples before (n = 362) and after (n = 366) the 2012 US presidential election. Liberals show slightly more concern for their partners’ outcomes compared to conservatives (study 1), and in study 2 this relation is supported by a meta-analysis (r =.15). However, in study 1, political ideology did not relate to cooperation in general. Both Republicans and Democrats extend more cooperation to their in-group relative to the out-group, and this is explained by expectations of cooperation from in-group versus out-group members. We discuss the relation between political ideology and cooperation within and between groups.

KW - cooperation

KW - in-group favoritism

KW - political ideology

KW - right-wing authoritarianism

KW - social dominance orientation

KW - trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014809916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014809916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022002716658694

DO - 10.1177/0022002716658694

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 797

EP - 818

JO - The Journal of Conflict Resolution

JF - The Journal of Conflict Resolution

SN - 0022-0027

IS - 4

ER -