Poly-truth, or the limits of pluralism: Popular debates on conspiracy theories in a post-truth era

Jaron Harambam*, Kamile Grusauskaite, Lars de Wildt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Conspiracy theories are central to “post-truth” discussions. Official knowledge, backed by science, politics, and media, is distrusted by various people resorting to alternative (conspiratorial) explanations. While elite commentators lament the rise of such “untruths,” we know little of people’s everyday opinions on this topic, despite their societal ramifications. We therefore performed a qualitative content analysis of 522 comments under a Dutch newspaper article on conspiracy theories to study how ordinary people discuss post-truth matters. We found four main points of controversy: “habitus of distrust”; “who to involve in public debates”; “which ways of knowing to allow”; and “what is at stake?” The diverging opinions outline the limits of pluralism in a post-truth era, revealing tensions between technocratic and democratic ideals in society. We show that popular opinions on conspiracy theories embody more complexity and nuance than elite conceptions of post-truth allow for: they lay bare the multiple sociological dimensions of poly-truth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)784-798
Number of pages15
JournalPublic Understanding of Science
Volume31
Issue number6
Early online date28 Apr 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This article is based on research funded by the European Commission, Marie Sklodowksa-Curie Action Individual Fellowship “Media andConspiracy”, No: 799815

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This article is based on research funded by the European Commission, Marie Sklodowksa-Curie Action Individual Fellowship “Media andConspiracy”, No: 799815

FundersFunder number
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
European Commission799815

    Keywords

    • conspiracy theories
    • disinformation
    • epistemology
    • expertise
    • experts
    • pluralism
    • poly-truth
    • post-truth
    • public debate

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Poly-truth, or the limits of pluralism: Popular debates on conspiracy theories in a post-truth era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this