Positive and Negative Externalities in Innovation, Trade, and Regional Economic Growth

A.A. Batabyal, P. Nijkamp

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review


We build on Grossman and Helpman (1991), Rivera-Batiz and Romer (1991), Acemoglu (2009, pp. 678-80), and Batabyal and Nijkamp (2013b) and analyze the interactions between positive and negative externalities in innovation and trade for economic growth in a region when this region is part of an aggregate economy consisting of two regions. In both regions, consumers have constant relative risk aversion preferences; there is human capital use, and there are three kinds of manufacturing activities involving the production of blueprints for inputs or machines, the inputs or machines themselves, and a single final good for consumption. We study two cases. In the first case, although no growth occurs in the human capital stock, innovative activities give rise to positive externalities or knowledge spillovers in two ways. In this setting, we, study whether and under what circumstances opening a region to trade results in an increase in this region's equilibrium growth rate. © 2014 The Ohio State University.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
JournalGeographical Analysis
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Bibliographical note

PT: J; NR: 27; TC: 1; J9: GEOGR ANAL; PG: 17; GA: AA0ON; UT: WOS:000330794600001


Dive into the research topics of 'Positive and Negative Externalities in Innovation, Trade, and Regional Economic Growth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this