Positive effects of fragmentation per se on the most iconic metapopulation

Carmen Galán-Acedo, Lenore Fahrig, Federico Riva, Torsti Schulz

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

While habitat loss is a major threat to species, the effects of habitat fragmentation independent of habitat loss (fragmentation per se) are debated. Metapopulation studies often assert negative fragmentation effects, but they do not measure fragmentation per se. We evaluate the effects of fragmentation per se (patch density) across 20 years of patch occupancy patterns of the Åland Islands Glanville fritillary butterfly, Finland, a famous model system in metapopulation studies. Fragmentation per se had mainly positive effects on patch occupancy, the proportion of years occupied per patch, and patch colonization, and negative effects on patch extinction. These results suggest that fragmentation per se does not threaten persistence of the Åland Islands Glanville fritillary butterfly. Our results support the growing body of research challenging the paradigm that habitat fragmentation per se is mostly negative for species, highlighting the value of small patches for species conservation.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13017
JournalConservation Letters
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Apr 2024

Funding

This work was funded by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to Lenore Fahrig. The authors would like to thank members of the Geomatics and Landscape Ecology Research Laboratory at Carleton University for discussions that helped motivate and improve this work.

FundersFunder number
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Positive effects of fragmentation per se on the most iconic metapopulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this