Poverty in Palanpur

Peter Lanjouw, Nicholas Stern

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The meaning and identification of poverty are examined using three indicators of standard of living in the North Indian village of Palanpur. The first is intended as a measure of "apparent prosperity" based on the personal assessments of investigators after intensive field work in the village over the full agricultural year 1983-84. The other two are income in 1983-84, and a measure of permanent income obtained by averaging incomes from four surveys conducted over a twenty-six-year interval. A comparison of these three indicators shows that income measured in any one year may give a misleading impression of the incidence of poverty. The risk of poverty for households is calculated. Vulnerability is high among low-caste households and those which are involved in agricultural labor. Categories, however, are not homogeneous; for example, whereas the landless and widows are more likely to be poor, some of such households are quite well off. It is argued that poverty in a good agricultural year is a better indicator of sustained poverty than poverty in a bad year. Occupational mobility out of agricultural labor is low, and changes in the distribution of land are largely accounted for by demographic processes such as household splits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-55
Number of pages33
JournalWorld Bank Economic Review
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1991

Fingerprint

Poverty
poverty
Personnel
income
agricultural labor
village
labor
Widowhood
caste
widow
living standard
standard of living
prosperity
Vulnerability
Social Class
fieldwork
Averaging
Incidence
vulnerability
incidence

Cite this

Lanjouw, Peter ; Stern, Nicholas. / Poverty in Palanpur. In: World Bank Economic Review. 1991 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 23-55.
@article{2bf93f6d6df54fb887128110abbe4cfa,
title = "Poverty in Palanpur",
abstract = "The meaning and identification of poverty are examined using three indicators of standard of living in the North Indian village of Palanpur. The first is intended as a measure of {"}apparent prosperity{"} based on the personal assessments of investigators after intensive field work in the village over the full agricultural year 1983-84. The other two are income in 1983-84, and a measure of permanent income obtained by averaging incomes from four surveys conducted over a twenty-six-year interval. A comparison of these three indicators shows that income measured in any one year may give a misleading impression of the incidence of poverty. The risk of poverty for households is calculated. Vulnerability is high among low-caste households and those which are involved in agricultural labor. Categories, however, are not homogeneous; for example, whereas the landless and widows are more likely to be poor, some of such households are quite well off. It is argued that poverty in a good agricultural year is a better indicator of sustained poverty than poverty in a bad year. Occupational mobility out of agricultural labor is low, and changes in the distribution of land are largely accounted for by demographic processes such as household splits.",
author = "Peter Lanjouw and Nicholas Stern",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1093/wber/5.1.23",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "23--55",
journal = "World Bank Economic Review",
issn = "0258-6770",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Poverty in Palanpur. / Lanjouw, Peter; Stern, Nicholas.

In: World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.1991, p. 23-55.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Poverty in Palanpur

AU - Lanjouw, Peter

AU - Stern, Nicholas

PY - 1991/1

Y1 - 1991/1

N2 - The meaning and identification of poverty are examined using three indicators of standard of living in the North Indian village of Palanpur. The first is intended as a measure of "apparent prosperity" based on the personal assessments of investigators after intensive field work in the village over the full agricultural year 1983-84. The other two are income in 1983-84, and a measure of permanent income obtained by averaging incomes from four surveys conducted over a twenty-six-year interval. A comparison of these three indicators shows that income measured in any one year may give a misleading impression of the incidence of poverty. The risk of poverty for households is calculated. Vulnerability is high among low-caste households and those which are involved in agricultural labor. Categories, however, are not homogeneous; for example, whereas the landless and widows are more likely to be poor, some of such households are quite well off. It is argued that poverty in a good agricultural year is a better indicator of sustained poverty than poverty in a bad year. Occupational mobility out of agricultural labor is low, and changes in the distribution of land are largely accounted for by demographic processes such as household splits.

AB - The meaning and identification of poverty are examined using three indicators of standard of living in the North Indian village of Palanpur. The first is intended as a measure of "apparent prosperity" based on the personal assessments of investigators after intensive field work in the village over the full agricultural year 1983-84. The other two are income in 1983-84, and a measure of permanent income obtained by averaging incomes from four surveys conducted over a twenty-six-year interval. A comparison of these three indicators shows that income measured in any one year may give a misleading impression of the incidence of poverty. The risk of poverty for households is calculated. Vulnerability is high among low-caste households and those which are involved in agricultural labor. Categories, however, are not homogeneous; for example, whereas the landless and widows are more likely to be poor, some of such households are quite well off. It is argued that poverty in a good agricultural year is a better indicator of sustained poverty than poverty in a bad year. Occupational mobility out of agricultural labor is low, and changes in the distribution of land are largely accounted for by demographic processes such as household splits.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025943296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025943296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/wber/5.1.23

DO - 10.1093/wber/5.1.23

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 23

EP - 55

JO - World Bank Economic Review

JF - World Bank Economic Review

SN - 0258-6770

IS - 1

ER -