TY - JOUR
T1 - Practical actions for applied systematic conservation planning
AU - Botts, Emily A.
AU - Pence, Genevieve
AU - Holness, Stephen
AU - Sink, Kerry
AU - Skowno, Andrew
AU - Driver, Amanda
AU - Harris, Linda R.
AU - Desmet, Philip
AU - Escott, Boyd
AU - Lötter, Mervyn
AU - Nel, Jeanne
AU - Smith, Tammy
AU - Daniels, Fahiema
AU - Sinclair, Samuel
AU - Stewart, Warrick
AU - Manuel, Jeffrey
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - Systematic conservation planning is intended to inform spatially explicit decision making. Doing so requires that it be integrated into complex regulatory and governance processes, and there are limited instances where this has been achieved effectively. South Africa is a global leader in the application of conservation plans, the outputs of which are widely used for spatial planning and decision making in many spheres of government. We aimed to determine how conservation planning in the country progressed from theory to implementation, and to identify practical actions that enabled this transition, by assessing temporal trends in the characteristics of conservation plans (1990–2017, n = 94). Since 2010 conservation planning has entered an operational period characterized by government leadership of plans, administrative rather than ecological planning domains, decreasing size of planning units, increasing emphasis on end-user products, and scheduled revision of plans. Key actions that enabled this progression include transitioning leadership of plans from scientists to practitioners, building capacity within implementing agencies, creating opportunities to integrate plans in legislative processes, establishing a strong community of practice, adopting implementation-focused methods, and balancing standardization with innovation. Learning from this model will allow other countries, particularly those with a similar megadiverse, developing context, to operationalize conservation planning into spatial planning and decision making.
AB - Systematic conservation planning is intended to inform spatially explicit decision making. Doing so requires that it be integrated into complex regulatory and governance processes, and there are limited instances where this has been achieved effectively. South Africa is a global leader in the application of conservation plans, the outputs of which are widely used for spatial planning and decision making in many spheres of government. We aimed to determine how conservation planning in the country progressed from theory to implementation, and to identify practical actions that enabled this transition, by assessing temporal trends in the characteristics of conservation plans (1990–2017, n = 94). Since 2010 conservation planning has entered an operational period characterized by government leadership of plans, administrative rather than ecological planning domains, decreasing size of planning units, increasing emphasis on end-user products, and scheduled revision of plans. Key actions that enabled this progression include transitioning leadership of plans from scientists to practitioners, building capacity within implementing agencies, creating opportunities to integrate plans in legislative processes, establishing a strong community of practice, adopting implementation-focused methods, and balancing standardization with innovation. Learning from this model will allow other countries, particularly those with a similar megadiverse, developing context, to operationalize conservation planning into spatial planning and decision making.
KW - biodiversity mainstreaming
KW - community of practice
KW - decision making
KW - implementación
KW - implementation
KW - integración de la biodiversidad
KW - interfaz ciencia-política
KW - omunidad de práctica
KW - planeación espacial
KW - planeación sistemática de la conservación
KW - science-policy interface
KW - South Africa
KW - spatial planning
KW - Sudáfrica
KW - systematic conservation planning
KW - toma de decisiones
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066998074&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066998074&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/cobi.13321
DO - 10.1111/cobi.13321
M3 - Article
C2 - 30912598
AN - SCOPUS:85066998074
SN - 0888-8892
VL - 33
SP - 1235
EP - 1246
JO - Conservation Biology
JF - Conservation Biology
IS - 6
ER -