Practice variation in long-term care access and use: The role of the ability to pay

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Practice variation in publicly financed long-term care (LTC) may be inefficient and inequitable, similarly to practice variation in the health care sector. Although most OECD countries spend an increasing share of their gross domestic product on LTC, it has received comparatively little attention to date compared with the health care sector. This paper contributes to the literature by assessing and comparing regional practice variation in both access to and use of institutional LTC and investigating its relation with income and out-of-pocket payment. For this, we have access to unique individual-level data covering the entire Dutch population. Even though we found practice variation in the use of LTC once access was granted, the variation between regions was still relatively small compared with international standards. In addition, we showed how a co-payment measure could be used to reduce practice variation across care office regions and income classes making the LTC system not only more efficient but also more equitable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1277-1292
Number of pages16
JournalHealth Economics
Volume28
Issue number11
Early online date30 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Long-Term Care
Health Care Sector
Gross Domestic Product
Health Expenditures
Population

Keywords

  • health care
  • health care financing
  • inequality
  • regional consumer behaviour

Cite this

@article{efe2d688f19440b287a3987005e9d93d,
title = "Practice variation in long-term care access and use: The role of the ability to pay",
abstract = "Practice variation in publicly financed long-term care (LTC) may be inefficient and inequitable, similarly to practice variation in the health care sector. Although most OECD countries spend an increasing share of their gross domestic product on LTC, it has received comparatively little attention to date compared with the health care sector. This paper contributes to the literature by assessing and comparing regional practice variation in both access to and use of institutional LTC and investigating its relation with income and out-of-pocket payment. For this, we have access to unique individual-level data covering the entire Dutch population. Even though we found practice variation in the use of LTC once access was granted, the variation between regions was still relatively small compared with international standards. In addition, we showed how a co-payment measure could be used to reduce practice variation across care office regions and income classes making the LTC system not only more efficient but also more equitable.",
keywords = "health care, health care financing, inequality, regional consumer behaviour",
author = "Daisy Duell and Maarten Lindeboom and Xander Koolman and France Portrait",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/hec.3940",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1277--1292",
journal = "Health Economics",
issn = "1057-9230",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "11",

}

Practice variation in long-term care access and use : The role of the ability to pay. / Duell, Daisy; Lindeboom, Maarten; Koolman, Xander; Portrait, France.

In: Health Economics, Vol. 28, No. 11, 01.11.2019, p. 1277-1292.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice variation in long-term care access and use

T2 - The role of the ability to pay

AU - Duell, Daisy

AU - Lindeboom, Maarten

AU - Koolman, Xander

AU - Portrait, France

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Practice variation in publicly financed long-term care (LTC) may be inefficient and inequitable, similarly to practice variation in the health care sector. Although most OECD countries spend an increasing share of their gross domestic product on LTC, it has received comparatively little attention to date compared with the health care sector. This paper contributes to the literature by assessing and comparing regional practice variation in both access to and use of institutional LTC and investigating its relation with income and out-of-pocket payment. For this, we have access to unique individual-level data covering the entire Dutch population. Even though we found practice variation in the use of LTC once access was granted, the variation between regions was still relatively small compared with international standards. In addition, we showed how a co-payment measure could be used to reduce practice variation across care office regions and income classes making the LTC system not only more efficient but also more equitable.

AB - Practice variation in publicly financed long-term care (LTC) may be inefficient and inequitable, similarly to practice variation in the health care sector. Although most OECD countries spend an increasing share of their gross domestic product on LTC, it has received comparatively little attention to date compared with the health care sector. This paper contributes to the literature by assessing and comparing regional practice variation in both access to and use of institutional LTC and investigating its relation with income and out-of-pocket payment. For this, we have access to unique individual-level data covering the entire Dutch population. Even though we found practice variation in the use of LTC once access was granted, the variation between regions was still relatively small compared with international standards. In addition, we showed how a co-payment measure could be used to reduce practice variation across care office regions and income classes making the LTC system not only more efficient but also more equitable.

KW - health care

KW - health care financing

KW - inequality

KW - regional consumer behaviour

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071391457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071391457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hec.3940

DO - 10.1002/hec.3940

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1277

EP - 1292

JO - Health Economics

JF - Health Economics

SN - 1057-9230

IS - 11

ER -