Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review

Rea Ščepanović*, Krishma Labib, Ivan Buljan, Joeri Tijdink, Ana Marušić

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Research integrity (RI) is a continuously developing concept, and increasing emphasis is put on creating RI promotion practices. This study aimed to map the existing RI guidance documents at research performing organisations (RPOs) and research funding organisations (RFOs). A search of bibliographic databases and grey literature sources was performed, and retrieved documents were screened for eligibility. The search of bibliographical databases and reference lists of selected articles identified a total of 92 documents while the search of grey literature sources identified 118 documents for analysis. The retrieved documents were analysed based on their geographical origin, research field and organisational origin (RPO or RFO) of RI practices, types of guidance presented in them, and target groups to which RI practices are directed. Most of the identified practices were developed for research in general, and are applicable to all research fields (n = 117) and medical sciences (n = 78). They were mostly written in the form of guidelines (n = 136) and targeted researchers (n = 167). A comprehensive search of the existing RI promotion practices showed that initiatives mostly come from RPOs while only a few RI practices originate from RFOs. This study showed that more RI guidance documents are needed for natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities since only a small number of documents was developed specifically for these research fields. The explored documents and the gaps in knowledge identified in this study can be used for further development of RI promotion practices in RPOs and RFOs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalScience and Engineering Ethics
Volume27
Issue number1
Early online date27 Jan 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

Funding

We would like to thank Ana Utrobi?i?, MA, from the University of Split School of Medicine, for her help in developing the search strategy for the scoping review.

FundersFunder number
European Commission HORIZON 2020 framework programme for Research and Innovation
University of Split School of Medicine
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme824481

    Keywords

    • Research ethics
    • Research funding organisations
    • Research integrity
    • Research integrity practices
    • Research integrity promotion
    • Research performing organisations

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this