Abstract
Research integrity (RI) is a continuously developing concept, and increasing emphasis is put on creating RI promotion practices. This study aimed to map the existing RI guidance documents at research performing organisations (RPOs) and research funding organisations (RFOs). A search of bibliographic databases and grey literature sources was performed, and retrieved documents were screened for eligibility. The search of bibliographical databases and reference lists of selected articles identified a total of 92 documents while the search of grey literature sources identified 118 documents for analysis. The retrieved documents were analysed based on their geographical origin, research field and organisational origin (RPO or RFO) of RI practices, types of guidance presented in them, and target groups to which RI practices are directed. Most of the identified practices were developed for research in general, and are applicable to all research fields (n = 117) and medical sciences (n = 78). They were mostly written in the form of guidelines (n = 136) and targeted researchers (n = 167). A comprehensive search of the existing RI promotion practices showed that initiatives mostly come from RPOs while only a few RI practices originate from RFOs. This study showed that more RI guidance documents are needed for natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities since only a small number of documents was developed specifically for these research fields. The explored documents and the gaps in knowledge identified in this study can be used for further development of RI promotion practices in RPOs and RFOs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-20 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Science and Engineering Ethics |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 27 Jan 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2021 |
Funding
We would like to thank Ana Utrobičić, MA, from the University of Split School of Medicine, for her help in developing the search strategy for the scoping review. This study was funded by the European Commission HORIZON 2020 framework programme for Research and Innovation under Grant Agreement number 824481—project "Standard Operating Procedures for Research Integrity—SOPs4RI". The funder had no role in the design of this study and did not have any role during its execution, analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| European Commission HORIZON 2020 framework programme for Research and Innovation | |
| University of Split School of Medicine | |
| Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 824481 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Research ethics
- Research funding organisations
- Research integrity
- Research integrity practices
- Research integrity promotion
- Research performing organisations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver