Practitioner Perspectives on Going Concern Opinion Research and Suggestions for Further Study: Part 2—Reporting Environment and the Decision-Making Process

Marshall A. Geiger, Anna Gold, Philip Wallage

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Auditing researchers rarely engage practicing auditors regarding the phenomena examined, or conclusions reached, in academic research. In an attempt to bridge this gap, we report on the outcomes, insights, and observations from focused interactions with Dutch audit practitioners regarding their perspectives on recent research regarding auditor going concern opinion (GCO) decisions. We provided practitioners with a summary of some of the most salient recent GCO research findings. The goals of our subsequent discussions were to (1) obtain practitioners’ responses to the research findings, and (2) identify relevant issues for future study from the perspective of practitioners. Accordingly, in this second of a two-part sequence of articles, we discuss the outcomes of our interactions with practitioners related to the GCO reporting environment and the GCO decision-making process, as well as directions for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-178
Number of pages10
JournalAccounting Horizons
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, American Accounting Association. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • audit practice
  • audit practitioner views
  • auditor going concern opinions
  • auditor reports

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Practitioner Perspectives on Going Concern Opinion Research and Suggestions for Further Study: Part 2—Reporting Environment and the Decision-Making Process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this