Precision of the CAESAR scan-extracted measurements

Kathleen M. Robinette, Hein A M Daanen

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) body scanners are increasingly used to derive 1D body dimensions from 3D whole body scans for instance, as input for clothing grading systems to make made-to-measure clothing or for width and depth dimensions of a seated workstation. In this study, the precision of the scanner-derived 1D dimensions from the CAESAR survey, a multinational anthropometric survey, was investigated. Two combinations of scanning teams with 3D whole body scanners were compared, one called the US Team and the other the Dutch Team. Twenty subjects were measured three times by one scanner and one team, and three times by the other combination. The subjects were marked prior to scanning using small dots, and the linear distances between the dots were calculated after processing the scans. The mean absolute difference (MAD) of the repetitions was calculated and this was compared to reported acceptable errors in manual measurements from the US Army's ANSUR survey when similar measurements were available. In addition, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for all measurements. The results indicate that the CAESAR scan-extracted measurements are highly reproducible; for most measures the MAD is less than 5 mm. In addition, more than 93% of the MAD values for CAESAR are significantly smaller than the ANSUR survey acceptable errors. Therefore, it is concluded that the type of scan-extracted measures used in CAESAR are as good as or better than comparable manual measurements. Scan-extracted measurements that do not use markers or are not straight-line distances are not represented here and additional studies would be needed to verify their precision.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-265
Number of pages7
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

Clothing
clothing
Whole Body Imaging
Scanning
workstation
grading
military
Surveys and Questionnaires
Processing
Values

Keywords

  • Anthropometry
  • Survey
  • Three-dimensional

Cite this

Robinette, Kathleen M. ; Daanen, Hein A M. / Precision of the CAESAR scan-extracted measurements. In: Applied Ergonomics. 2006 ; Vol. 37, No. 3. pp. 259-265.
@article{6a72fd9b6fdd492a9976c1dd9f662457,
title = "Precision of the CAESAR scan-extracted measurements",
abstract = "Three-dimensional (3D) body scanners are increasingly used to derive 1D body dimensions from 3D whole body scans for instance, as input for clothing grading systems to make made-to-measure clothing or for width and depth dimensions of a seated workstation. In this study, the precision of the scanner-derived 1D dimensions from the CAESAR survey, a multinational anthropometric survey, was investigated. Two combinations of scanning teams with 3D whole body scanners were compared, one called the US Team and the other the Dutch Team. Twenty subjects were measured three times by one scanner and one team, and three times by the other combination. The subjects were marked prior to scanning using small dots, and the linear distances between the dots were calculated after processing the scans. The mean absolute difference (MAD) of the repetitions was calculated and this was compared to reported acceptable errors in manual measurements from the US Army's ANSUR survey when similar measurements were available. In addition, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for all measurements. The results indicate that the CAESAR scan-extracted measurements are highly reproducible; for most measures the MAD is less than 5 mm. In addition, more than 93{\%} of the MAD values for CAESAR are significantly smaller than the ANSUR survey acceptable errors. Therefore, it is concluded that the type of scan-extracted measures used in CAESAR are as good as or better than comparable manual measurements. Scan-extracted measurements that do not use markers or are not straight-line distances are not represented here and additional studies would be needed to verify their precision.",
keywords = "Anthropometry, Survey, Three-dimensional",
author = "Robinette, {Kathleen M.} and Daanen, {Hein A M}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.apergo.2005.07.009",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "259--265",
journal = "Applied Ergonomics",
issn = "0003-6870",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

Precision of the CAESAR scan-extracted measurements. / Robinette, Kathleen M.; Daanen, Hein A M.

In: Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 37, No. 3, 05.2006, p. 259-265.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Precision of the CAESAR scan-extracted measurements

AU - Robinette, Kathleen M.

AU - Daanen, Hein A M

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Three-dimensional (3D) body scanners are increasingly used to derive 1D body dimensions from 3D whole body scans for instance, as input for clothing grading systems to make made-to-measure clothing or for width and depth dimensions of a seated workstation. In this study, the precision of the scanner-derived 1D dimensions from the CAESAR survey, a multinational anthropometric survey, was investigated. Two combinations of scanning teams with 3D whole body scanners were compared, one called the US Team and the other the Dutch Team. Twenty subjects were measured three times by one scanner and one team, and three times by the other combination. The subjects were marked prior to scanning using small dots, and the linear distances between the dots were calculated after processing the scans. The mean absolute difference (MAD) of the repetitions was calculated and this was compared to reported acceptable errors in manual measurements from the US Army's ANSUR survey when similar measurements were available. In addition, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for all measurements. The results indicate that the CAESAR scan-extracted measurements are highly reproducible; for most measures the MAD is less than 5 mm. In addition, more than 93% of the MAD values for CAESAR are significantly smaller than the ANSUR survey acceptable errors. Therefore, it is concluded that the type of scan-extracted measures used in CAESAR are as good as or better than comparable manual measurements. Scan-extracted measurements that do not use markers or are not straight-line distances are not represented here and additional studies would be needed to verify their precision.

AB - Three-dimensional (3D) body scanners are increasingly used to derive 1D body dimensions from 3D whole body scans for instance, as input for clothing grading systems to make made-to-measure clothing or for width and depth dimensions of a seated workstation. In this study, the precision of the scanner-derived 1D dimensions from the CAESAR survey, a multinational anthropometric survey, was investigated. Two combinations of scanning teams with 3D whole body scanners were compared, one called the US Team and the other the Dutch Team. Twenty subjects were measured three times by one scanner and one team, and three times by the other combination. The subjects were marked prior to scanning using small dots, and the linear distances between the dots were calculated after processing the scans. The mean absolute difference (MAD) of the repetitions was calculated and this was compared to reported acceptable errors in manual measurements from the US Army's ANSUR survey when similar measurements were available. In addition, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for all measurements. The results indicate that the CAESAR scan-extracted measurements are highly reproducible; for most measures the MAD is less than 5 mm. In addition, more than 93% of the MAD values for CAESAR are significantly smaller than the ANSUR survey acceptable errors. Therefore, it is concluded that the type of scan-extracted measures used in CAESAR are as good as or better than comparable manual measurements. Scan-extracted measurements that do not use markers or are not straight-line distances are not represented here and additional studies would be needed to verify their precision.

KW - Anthropometry

KW - Survey

KW - Three-dimensional

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32044461103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.07.009

DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.07.009

M3 - Review article

VL - 37

SP - 259

EP - 265

JO - Applied Ergonomics

JF - Applied Ergonomics

SN - 0003-6870

IS - 3

ER -