Predicting academic success in higher education: what’s more important than being smart?

F.R. Kappe, H. van der Flier

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    This study investigated the combined predictive validity of intelligence and personality factors on multiple measures of academic achievement. Students in a college of higher education in the Netherlands (N0137) completed a survey that measured intelligence, the Big Five personality traits, motivation, and four specific personality traits. Student performance was measured with grade point average (GPA) and time to graduation, as well as with five specific performance measures: regular exams, skills training, team projects, internships, and a written thesis. Results show that 33% of the variance in GPA and 30% of the variance in time to graduation can be explained by combining intelligence, personality, and motivational predictors. Conscientiousness is the best predictor across a broad spectrum of academic achievement measures and explains five times as much variance in GPA as does intelligence. The practical implications are that institutes of higher education should collect personality data on students at the outset and then help students accordingly. Highly conscientious students who are organized and internally motivated might potentially be offered more challenging honours programs with corresponding special commendations on their diplomas, whereas students who score low on conscientious would receive more structure through student study groups, frequent deadlines, shorter assignments, group assignments, clearly defined learning goals, and less second chances for passing examinations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)605-619
    Number of pages15
    JournalEuropean Journal of Psychology of Education
    Issue number27
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting academic success in higher education: what’s more important than being smart?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this