TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting management career success from assessment center data: A longitudinal study
AU - Jansen, P.G.W.
AU - Vinkenburg, C.J.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - The authors investigated trends over a 13-year period in the predictive validity of assessment center data for objective career advancement for a sample of 456 academic graduates. Using year of entry and tenure as controls, findings from research into managerial effectiveness and development were confirmed with respect to the importance of interpersonal effectiveness, firmness, and ambition for long-term career success. Within the long-tenured group the validity of the overall assessment rating (OAR) corrected for initial differences in starting salaries and for restriction in range, was 0.35. Substantial long-term validities were obtained for ratings from the assessment center exercises. Computation of validities after three to five years of tenure of the same cohort in addition revealed some dynamic validity patterns. For instance, the OAR was important for early and late career success only for the group that was still present after 12 years, and its validity increased over time. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
AB - The authors investigated trends over a 13-year period in the predictive validity of assessment center data for objective career advancement for a sample of 456 academic graduates. Using year of entry and tenure as controls, findings from research into managerial effectiveness and development were confirmed with respect to the importance of interpersonal effectiveness, firmness, and ambition for long-term career success. Within the long-tenured group the validity of the overall assessment rating (OAR) corrected for initial differences in starting salaries and for restriction in range, was 0.35. Substantial long-term validities were obtained for ratings from the assessment center exercises. Computation of validities after three to five years of tenure of the same cohort in addition revealed some dynamic validity patterns. For instance, the OAR was important for early and late career success only for the group that was still present after 12 years, and its validity increased over time. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.004
M3 - Article
SN - 0001-8791
VL - 68
SP - 253
EP - 266
JO - Journal of Vocational Behavior
JF - Journal of Vocational Behavior
ER -