Predicting the influence of hip and lumbar flexibility on lifting motions using optimal control

Manish Sreenivasa, Matthew Millard, Idsart Kingma, Jaap H. van Dieën, Katja Mombaur

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Computational models of the human body coupled with optimization can be used to predict the influence of variables that cannot be experimentally manipulated. Here, we present a study that predicts the motion of the human body while lifting a box, as a function of flexibility of the hip and lumbar joints in the sagittal plane. We modeled the human body in the sagittal plane with joints actuated by pairs of agonist-antagonist muscle torque generators, and a passive hamstring muscle. The characteristics of a stiff, average and flexible person were represented by co-varying the lumbar range-of-motion, lumbar passive extensor-torque and the hamstring passive muscle-force. We used optimal control to solve for motions that simulated lifting a 10 kg box from a 0.3 m height. The solution minimized the total sum of the normalized squared active and passive muscle torques and the normalized passive hamstring muscle forces, over the duration of the motion. The predicted motion of the average lifter agreed well with experimental data in the literature. The change in model flexibility affected the predicted joint angles, with the stiffer models flexing more at the hip and knee, and less at the lumbar joint, to complete the lift. Stiffer models produced similar passive lumbar torque and higher hamstring muscle force components than the more flexible models. The variation between the motion characteristics of the models suggest that flexibility may play an important role in determining lifting technique.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-125
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume78
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Muscle
Torque
Hip
Human Body
Joints
Muscles
Hip Joint
Articular Range of Motion
Knee
Hamstring Muscles

Keywords

  • Box lifting
  • Human models
  • Joint flexibility
  • Motion prediction
  • Optimal control

Cite this

@article{09cb8b7af62e487eac25fba6befd38a3,
title = "Predicting the influence of hip and lumbar flexibility on lifting motions using optimal control",
abstract = "Computational models of the human body coupled with optimization can be used to predict the influence of variables that cannot be experimentally manipulated. Here, we present a study that predicts the motion of the human body while lifting a box, as a function of flexibility of the hip and lumbar joints in the sagittal plane. We modeled the human body in the sagittal plane with joints actuated by pairs of agonist-antagonist muscle torque generators, and a passive hamstring muscle. The characteristics of a stiff, average and flexible person were represented by co-varying the lumbar range-of-motion, lumbar passive extensor-torque and the hamstring passive muscle-force. We used optimal control to solve for motions that simulated lifting a 10 kg box from a 0.3 m height. The solution minimized the total sum of the normalized squared active and passive muscle torques and the normalized passive hamstring muscle forces, over the duration of the motion. The predicted motion of the average lifter agreed well with experimental data in the literature. The change in model flexibility affected the predicted joint angles, with the stiffer models flexing more at the hip and knee, and less at the lumbar joint, to complete the lift. Stiffer models produced similar passive lumbar torque and higher hamstring muscle force components than the more flexible models. The variation between the motion characteristics of the models suggest that flexibility may play an important role in determining lifting technique.",
keywords = "Box lifting, Human models, Joint flexibility, Motion prediction, Optimal control",
author = "Manish Sreenivasa and Matthew Millard and Idsart Kingma and {van Die{\"e}n}, {Jaap H.} and Katja Mombaur",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.028",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "118--125",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Predicting the influence of hip and lumbar flexibility on lifting motions using optimal control. / Sreenivasa, Manish; Millard, Matthew; Kingma, Idsart; van Dieën, Jaap H.; Mombaur, Katja.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 78, 10.09.2018, p. 118-125.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting the influence of hip and lumbar flexibility on lifting motions using optimal control

AU - Sreenivasa, Manish

AU - Millard, Matthew

AU - Kingma, Idsart

AU - van Dieën, Jaap H.

AU - Mombaur, Katja

PY - 2018/9/10

Y1 - 2018/9/10

N2 - Computational models of the human body coupled with optimization can be used to predict the influence of variables that cannot be experimentally manipulated. Here, we present a study that predicts the motion of the human body while lifting a box, as a function of flexibility of the hip and lumbar joints in the sagittal plane. We modeled the human body in the sagittal plane with joints actuated by pairs of agonist-antagonist muscle torque generators, and a passive hamstring muscle. The characteristics of a stiff, average and flexible person were represented by co-varying the lumbar range-of-motion, lumbar passive extensor-torque and the hamstring passive muscle-force. We used optimal control to solve for motions that simulated lifting a 10 kg box from a 0.3 m height. The solution minimized the total sum of the normalized squared active and passive muscle torques and the normalized passive hamstring muscle forces, over the duration of the motion. The predicted motion of the average lifter agreed well with experimental data in the literature. The change in model flexibility affected the predicted joint angles, with the stiffer models flexing more at the hip and knee, and less at the lumbar joint, to complete the lift. Stiffer models produced similar passive lumbar torque and higher hamstring muscle force components than the more flexible models. The variation between the motion characteristics of the models suggest that flexibility may play an important role in determining lifting technique.

AB - Computational models of the human body coupled with optimization can be used to predict the influence of variables that cannot be experimentally manipulated. Here, we present a study that predicts the motion of the human body while lifting a box, as a function of flexibility of the hip and lumbar joints in the sagittal plane. We modeled the human body in the sagittal plane with joints actuated by pairs of agonist-antagonist muscle torque generators, and a passive hamstring muscle. The characteristics of a stiff, average and flexible person were represented by co-varying the lumbar range-of-motion, lumbar passive extensor-torque and the hamstring passive muscle-force. We used optimal control to solve for motions that simulated lifting a 10 kg box from a 0.3 m height. The solution minimized the total sum of the normalized squared active and passive muscle torques and the normalized passive hamstring muscle forces, over the duration of the motion. The predicted motion of the average lifter agreed well with experimental data in the literature. The change in model flexibility affected the predicted joint angles, with the stiffer models flexing more at the hip and knee, and less at the lumbar joint, to complete the lift. Stiffer models produced similar passive lumbar torque and higher hamstring muscle force components than the more flexible models. The variation between the motion characteristics of the models suggest that flexibility may play an important role in determining lifting technique.

KW - Box lifting

KW - Human models

KW - Joint flexibility

KW - Motion prediction

KW - Optimal control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051378915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051378915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.028

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.028

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 118

EP - 125

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

ER -