Abstract
Depression, anxiety and somatization influence the recovery of people with musculoskeletal pain. A Delphi study was conducted to reach consensus on the most appropriate self-administered questionnaires to assess these psychosocial factors in people at risk of developing persistent musculoskeletal pain. A multidisciplinary panel of international experts was identified via PubReMiner. The experts (N=22) suggested 24 questionnaires in Round 1. In Round 2, experts rated the questionnaires on suitability, considering clinimetrics, content, feasibility, personal experiences and expertise. The highest ranked questionnaires were retained for Round 3, in which the experts made a final assessment of the suitability of the questionnaires. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of (1) not all experts having participated in each round, and (2) experts having been involved in relevant questionnaire development. Consensus (i.e., ≥75% agreement) was reached for the following questionnaires. For depression: Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Beck Depression Inventory-II, Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, and Depression Subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales. In the sensitivity analyses, consensus was also reached for the Depression Subscale of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale. For anxiety: Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7, State and Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale. For somatization: no recommendation could be made. Perspective This study generated a short-list of preferred questionnaires to assess depression, anxiety and somatization in people with musculoskeletal pain. Broad implementation of these questionnaires by clinicians and researchers will facilitate easier comparison and pooling of baseline and outcome data. Some of the recommended questionnaires still require validation in this population.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-9 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Pain |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 3-4 |
Early online date | 2 Sept 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.Funding
The authors would like to thank all members of the expert panel for their input. The following experts provided consent to be listed: Geisser M, Ashgari A, Vowles KE, Palermo TM, Turk DC, Roth RS, Gerdle B, Kroenke K, Garcia-Campayo J, Hassett AL, Foti C, Mannion AF, Beneciuk JM, Cote P, Esteve R, Logan X, and Peters M. The authors would also like to acknowledge the Scientific College Physical Therapy (WCF) of the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF) for funding the study. Disclosures: This work was supported by a research grant from the Scientific College Physical Therapy (WCF) (2016-01) of the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Scientific College Physical Therapy | |
Westchester Community Foundation | 2016-01 |
Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie |