Prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure and self-reported immune-related diseases

A. J.J.M. Vingerhoets*, J. Assies, K. Goodkin, G. L. Van Heck, M. H. Bekker

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To compare self-reports of immune-related diseases in diethylstilbestrol (DES) daughters and controls. Prenatal exposure to DES has been associated with several malformations in the lower genital tract, a higher prevalence of adenosis, and increased risk of clear cell adenocarcinoma, and estrogen-dependent tumors. Lately, reports have been published indicating a link between DES exposure and alterations in the immune system. The present study focuses on the possible clinical consequences of an affected immune system. Study design: DES daughters (n=170) and control women (n=123) completed questionnaires containing lists of immune-related diseases, specified into three categories (i) allergies, (ii) auto-immune disorders, and (iii) infectious diseases. Results: DES daughters reported significantly more disease conditions than the controls. Analyses for separate disease categories (allergies, auto-immune disorders, infectious disease), yielded a statistically significant difference only for infectious disease. Within this last category, two infectious diseases yielded highly significant differences: bladder infection and measles. Conclusion: The present findings suggest that DES daughters are at higher risk of developing immune-related disease states.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-209
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume77
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 1998
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Immunity
  • Prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure
  • Self-reported health status

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure and self-reported immune-related diseases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this