Prevalence and nature of fungi in root canal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

I.F. Persoon, W. Crielaard, A.R. Özok

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The role of bacteria in causing apical periodontitis has been widely established, whilst the role of other microorganisms is studied less thoroughly. This systematic review and meta-analysis reviewed the literature for the prevalence and diversity of fungi in root canal infections. An extensive literature search was carried out in the Cochrane databases, EMBASE, MEDLINE, LILACS, SciELO and Web of Science. Additional studies were identified from six endodontic journals, four main endodontic textbooks and references of relevant papers. Selected clinical studies included sampling of necrotic pulps in permanent teeth and microbial analysis of these samples. Studies were critically appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Checklist. Meta-analysis was performed using MetaXL. The screening of 1041 titles and abstracts and full-text reading yielded 54 studies. The overall prevalence of fungi in root canal infections was 7.5% (CI 95%: 3.6–11.8%) in the inverse variance fixed effect heterogeneity model. Candida albicans was the most frequently isolated species. Significant heterogeneity was observed (P < 0.001, I2 = 85.04%). Subgroup analyses based on geographical location, period of publication, type of infection, state of general health, communication with the oral cavity, type of sample and identification method revealed no factor influencing the prevalence. Better standardized techniques and a comprehensive analysis will reveal a more detailed and accurate representation of the prevalence and nature of fungi in root canal infections.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1055-1066
JournalInternational Endodontic Journal
Volume50
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence and nature of fungi in root canal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this