Procedural justice in punishment systems: Inconsistent punishment procedures have detrimental effects on cooperation

J.W. van Prooijen, M. Gallucci, G. Toeset

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    151 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The current research examines a moderator who predicts in what situations punishment can have detrimental effects on cooperation. We hypothesized that when a punishment system is perceived as procedurally unfair, people's cooperation level decreases. Results of two experiments indicated that participants cooperated less in a group-based trust game when punishment was inconsistent between persons (i.e. not all group members would be punished for defection) than when punishment was consistent between persons (i.e. any group member who defected would be punished) or when there was no punishment. These effects were mediated by perceived belongingness. The authors conclude that an unfair punishment system leads people to feel marginalized as a group member, and this prompts them to display less cooperation. © 2008 The British Psychological Society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)311-324
    JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
    Volume47
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Procedural justice in punishment systems: Inconsistent punishment procedures have detrimental effects on cooperation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this