Abstract
This paper studies airline network optimality. We modify existing models (Brueckner and Spiller (1991) and Zhang (1996)) to explain airline network optimality, using heterogeneity and different market sizes. Dropping small destinations from a hub-spoke network may increase overall profits and total welfare. But consumer surplus is always higher with a full network. This leads to a policy dilemma: the airline may want to drop smaller destinations, while the local economy benefits from these destinations. The level of substitution hardly has an effect.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 415-429 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Transport Policy |
| Volume | 110 |
| Early online date | 18 Jun 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2021 |
Funding
The author would like to thanks participants of the ATRS conference and anonymous referees for valuable comments.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Product differentiation and network optimality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver