Profitability, power, or proximity? Organized crime groups investing their money in legal economy

E.W. Kruisbergen, E.R. Kleemans, R.F. Kouwenberg

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article uses empirical data from the Dutch Organized Crime Monitor to give empirical insight into the choices organized crime offenders make when they invest their money in legal economy. Using a dataset of 1196 individual investments, light is shed on what kind of assets offenders purchase and where these assets are located. The results are used to assess the tenability of different theoretical perspectives and assumptions that are present in the literature on money laundering and organized crime: the standard economic approach (‘profit’), the criminal infiltration approach (‘power’) and social opportunity structure (‘proximity’). The results of this study show that offenders predominantly invest in their country of origin or in their country of residence and that their investments consist of tangible, familiar assets such as residences and other real estate and (small) companies from well-known sectors. Investments such as bonds, options, and stocks in companies in which offenders are not personally (or indirectly) involved, such as stocks in companies noted on the stock exchange, were only found in a small number of cases. In other words: offenders usually stay close to home with their investments. So, instead of profitability or power, proximity seems to be a better description of their investment choices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-256
JournalEuropean Journal on Criminal Policy and Research
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

organized crime
profitability
offender
money
economy
assets
Group
money laundering
social opportunity
economic approach
stock exchange
subversion
country of origin
real estate
purchase
profit

Cite this

@article{737073a244ee4ffa9c17eb8df2628d84,
title = "Profitability, power, or proximity? Organized crime groups investing their money in legal economy",
abstract = "This article uses empirical data from the Dutch Organized Crime Monitor to give empirical insight into the choices organized crime offenders make when they invest their money in legal economy. Using a dataset of 1196 individual investments, light is shed on what kind of assets offenders purchase and where these assets are located. The results are used to assess the tenability of different theoretical perspectives and assumptions that are present in the literature on money laundering and organized crime: the standard economic approach (‘profit’), the criminal infiltration approach (‘power’) and social opportunity structure (‘proximity’). The results of this study show that offenders predominantly invest in their country of origin or in their country of residence and that their investments consist of tangible, familiar assets such as residences and other real estate and (small) companies from well-known sectors. Investments such as bonds, options, and stocks in companies in which offenders are not personally (or indirectly) involved, such as stocks in companies noted on the stock exchange, were only found in a small number of cases. In other words: offenders usually stay close to home with their investments. So, instead of profitability or power, proximity seems to be a better description of their investment choices.",
author = "E.W. Kruisbergen and E.R. Kleemans and R.F. Kouwenberg",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s10610-014-9263-5",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "237--256",
journal = "European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research",
issn = "0928-1371",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

Profitability, power, or proximity? Organized crime groups investing their money in legal economy. / Kruisbergen, E.W.; Kleemans, E.R.; Kouwenberg, R.F.

In: European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2015, p. 237-256.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Profitability, power, or proximity? Organized crime groups investing their money in legal economy

AU - Kruisbergen, E.W.

AU - Kleemans, E.R.

AU - Kouwenberg, R.F.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article uses empirical data from the Dutch Organized Crime Monitor to give empirical insight into the choices organized crime offenders make when they invest their money in legal economy. Using a dataset of 1196 individual investments, light is shed on what kind of assets offenders purchase and where these assets are located. The results are used to assess the tenability of different theoretical perspectives and assumptions that are present in the literature on money laundering and organized crime: the standard economic approach (‘profit’), the criminal infiltration approach (‘power’) and social opportunity structure (‘proximity’). The results of this study show that offenders predominantly invest in their country of origin or in their country of residence and that their investments consist of tangible, familiar assets such as residences and other real estate and (small) companies from well-known sectors. Investments such as bonds, options, and stocks in companies in which offenders are not personally (or indirectly) involved, such as stocks in companies noted on the stock exchange, were only found in a small number of cases. In other words: offenders usually stay close to home with their investments. So, instead of profitability or power, proximity seems to be a better description of their investment choices.

AB - This article uses empirical data from the Dutch Organized Crime Monitor to give empirical insight into the choices organized crime offenders make when they invest their money in legal economy. Using a dataset of 1196 individual investments, light is shed on what kind of assets offenders purchase and where these assets are located. The results are used to assess the tenability of different theoretical perspectives and assumptions that are present in the literature on money laundering and organized crime: the standard economic approach (‘profit’), the criminal infiltration approach (‘power’) and social opportunity structure (‘proximity’). The results of this study show that offenders predominantly invest in their country of origin or in their country of residence and that their investments consist of tangible, familiar assets such as residences and other real estate and (small) companies from well-known sectors. Investments such as bonds, options, and stocks in companies in which offenders are not personally (or indirectly) involved, such as stocks in companies noted on the stock exchange, were only found in a small number of cases. In other words: offenders usually stay close to home with their investments. So, instead of profitability or power, proximity seems to be a better description of their investment choices.

U2 - 10.1007/s10610-014-9263-5

DO - 10.1007/s10610-014-9263-5

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 237

EP - 256

JO - European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research

JF - European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research

SN - 0928-1371

IS - 2

ER -