Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance

Sander Chan, Idil Boran, Harro van Asselt, Gabriela Iacobuta, Navam Niles, Katharine Rietig, Michelle Scobie, Jennifer S. Bansard, Deborah Delgado Pugley, Laurence L. Delina, Friederike Eichhorn, Paula Ellinger, Okechukwu Enechi, Thomas Hale, Lukas Hermwille, Matthias Honegger, Andrea Hurtado Epstein, Stephanie La Hoz Theuer, Robert Mizo, Yixian Sun & 2 others Patrick Toussaint, Geoffrey Wambugu

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement stand as milestone diplomatic achievements. However, immense discrepancies between political commitments and governmental action remain. Combined national climate commitments fall far short of the Paris Agreement's 1.5/2°C targets. Similar political ambition gaps persist across various areas of sustainable development. Many therefore argue that actions by nonstate actors, such as businesses and investors, cities and regions, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), are crucial. These voices have resonated across the United Nations (UN) system, leading to growing recognition, promotion, and mobilization of such actions in ever greater numbers. This article investigates optimistic arguments about nonstate engagement, namely: (a) “the more the better”; (b) “everybody wins”; (c) “everyone does their part”; and (d) “more brings more.” However, these optimistic arguments may not be matched in practice due to governance risks. The current emphasis on quantifiable impacts may lead to the under-appreciation of variegated social, economic, and environmental impacts. Claims that everybody stands to benefit may easily be contradicted by outcomes that are not in line with priorities and needs in developing countries. Despite the seeming depoliticization of the role of nonstate actors in implementation, actions may still lead to politically contentious outcomes. Finally, nonstate climate and sustainability actions may not be self-reinforcing but may heavily depend on supporting mechanisms. The article concludes with governance risk-reduction strategies that can be combined to maximize nonstate potential in sustainable and climate-resilient transformations. This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere572
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

sustainability
climate
governance
sustainable development
social impact
United Nations
economic impact
nongovernmental organization
mobilization
political activity
environmental impact
developing world
social effects
social economics
investor
non-governmental organization
UNO
climate change
promotion
developing country

Keywords

  • climate change
  • governance
  • nonstate actions
  • SDGs
  • sustainable development

Cite this

Chan, S., Boran, I., van Asselt, H., Iacobuta, G., Niles, N., Rietig, K., ... Wambugu, G. (2019). Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1-8. [e572]. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.572
Chan, Sander ; Boran, Idil ; van Asselt, Harro ; Iacobuta, Gabriela ; Niles, Navam ; Rietig, Katharine ; Scobie, Michelle ; Bansard, Jennifer S. ; Delgado Pugley, Deborah ; Delina, Laurence L. ; Eichhorn, Friederike ; Ellinger, Paula ; Enechi, Okechukwu ; Hale, Thomas ; Hermwille, Lukas ; Honegger, Matthias ; Hurtado Epstein, Andrea ; La Hoz Theuer, Stephanie ; Mizo, Robert ; Sun, Yixian ; Toussaint, Patrick ; Wambugu, Geoffrey. / Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance. In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2019 ; pp. 1-8.
@article{ec9a4a14f1984cf9a911504b4bd607e2,
title = "Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance",
abstract = "Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement stand as milestone diplomatic achievements. However, immense discrepancies between political commitments and governmental action remain. Combined national climate commitments fall far short of the Paris Agreement's 1.5/2°C targets. Similar political ambition gaps persist across various areas of sustainable development. Many therefore argue that actions by nonstate actors, such as businesses and investors, cities and regions, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), are crucial. These voices have resonated across the United Nations (UN) system, leading to growing recognition, promotion, and mobilization of such actions in ever greater numbers. This article investigates optimistic arguments about nonstate engagement, namely: (a) “the more the better”; (b) “everybody wins”; (c) “everyone does their part”; and (d) “more brings more.” However, these optimistic arguments may not be matched in practice due to governance risks. The current emphasis on quantifiable impacts may lead to the under-appreciation of variegated social, economic, and environmental impacts. Claims that everybody stands to benefit may easily be contradicted by outcomes that are not in line with priorities and needs in developing countries. Despite the seeming depoliticization of the role of nonstate actors in implementation, actions may still lead to politically contentious outcomes. Finally, nonstate climate and sustainability actions may not be self-reinforcing but may heavily depend on supporting mechanisms. The article concludes with governance risk-reduction strategies that can be combined to maximize nonstate potential in sustainable and climate-resilient transformations. This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance.",
keywords = "climate change, governance, nonstate actions, SDGs, sustainable development",
author = "Sander Chan and Idil Boran and {van Asselt}, Harro and Gabriela Iacobuta and Navam Niles and Katharine Rietig and Michelle Scobie and Bansard, {Jennifer S.} and {Delgado Pugley}, Deborah and Delina, {Laurence L.} and Friederike Eichhorn and Paula Ellinger and Okechukwu Enechi and Thomas Hale and Lukas Hermwille and Matthias Honegger and {Hurtado Epstein}, Andrea and {La Hoz Theuer}, Stephanie and Robert Mizo and Yixian Sun and Patrick Toussaint and Geoffrey Wambugu",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1002/wcc.572",
language = "English",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change",
issn = "1757-7799",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

}

Chan, S, Boran, I, van Asselt, H, Iacobuta, G, Niles, N, Rietig, K, Scobie, M, Bansard, JS, Delgado Pugley, D, Delina, LL, Eichhorn, F, Ellinger, P, Enechi, O, Hale, T, Hermwille, L, Honegger, M, Hurtado Epstein, A, La Hoz Theuer, S, Mizo, R, Sun, Y, Toussaint, P & Wambugu, G 2019, 'Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance' Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.572

Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance. / Chan, Sander; Boran, Idil; van Asselt, Harro; Iacobuta, Gabriela; Niles, Navam; Rietig, Katharine; Scobie, Michelle; Bansard, Jennifer S.; Delgado Pugley, Deborah; Delina, Laurence L.; Eichhorn, Friederike; Ellinger, Paula; Enechi, Okechukwu; Hale, Thomas; Hermwille, Lukas; Honegger, Matthias; Hurtado Epstein, Andrea; La Hoz Theuer, Stephanie; Mizo, Robert; Sun, Yixian; Toussaint, Patrick; Wambugu, Geoffrey.

In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 03.01.2019, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance

AU - Chan, Sander

AU - Boran, Idil

AU - van Asselt, Harro

AU - Iacobuta, Gabriela

AU - Niles, Navam

AU - Rietig, Katharine

AU - Scobie, Michelle

AU - Bansard, Jennifer S.

AU - Delgado Pugley, Deborah

AU - Delina, Laurence L.

AU - Eichhorn, Friederike

AU - Ellinger, Paula

AU - Enechi, Okechukwu

AU - Hale, Thomas

AU - Hermwille, Lukas

AU - Honegger, Matthias

AU - Hurtado Epstein, Andrea

AU - La Hoz Theuer, Stephanie

AU - Mizo, Robert

AU - Sun, Yixian

AU - Toussaint, Patrick

AU - Wambugu, Geoffrey

PY - 2019/1/3

Y1 - 2019/1/3

N2 - Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement stand as milestone diplomatic achievements. However, immense discrepancies between political commitments and governmental action remain. Combined national climate commitments fall far short of the Paris Agreement's 1.5/2°C targets. Similar political ambition gaps persist across various areas of sustainable development. Many therefore argue that actions by nonstate actors, such as businesses and investors, cities and regions, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), are crucial. These voices have resonated across the United Nations (UN) system, leading to growing recognition, promotion, and mobilization of such actions in ever greater numbers. This article investigates optimistic arguments about nonstate engagement, namely: (a) “the more the better”; (b) “everybody wins”; (c) “everyone does their part”; and (d) “more brings more.” However, these optimistic arguments may not be matched in practice due to governance risks. The current emphasis on quantifiable impacts may lead to the under-appreciation of variegated social, economic, and environmental impacts. Claims that everybody stands to benefit may easily be contradicted by outcomes that are not in line with priorities and needs in developing countries. Despite the seeming depoliticization of the role of nonstate actors in implementation, actions may still lead to politically contentious outcomes. Finally, nonstate climate and sustainability actions may not be self-reinforcing but may heavily depend on supporting mechanisms. The article concludes with governance risk-reduction strategies that can be combined to maximize nonstate potential in sustainable and climate-resilient transformations. This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance.

AB - Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement stand as milestone diplomatic achievements. However, immense discrepancies between political commitments and governmental action remain. Combined national climate commitments fall far short of the Paris Agreement's 1.5/2°C targets. Similar political ambition gaps persist across various areas of sustainable development. Many therefore argue that actions by nonstate actors, such as businesses and investors, cities and regions, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), are crucial. These voices have resonated across the United Nations (UN) system, leading to growing recognition, promotion, and mobilization of such actions in ever greater numbers. This article investigates optimistic arguments about nonstate engagement, namely: (a) “the more the better”; (b) “everybody wins”; (c) “everyone does their part”; and (d) “more brings more.” However, these optimistic arguments may not be matched in practice due to governance risks. The current emphasis on quantifiable impacts may lead to the under-appreciation of variegated social, economic, and environmental impacts. Claims that everybody stands to benefit may easily be contradicted by outcomes that are not in line with priorities and needs in developing countries. Despite the seeming depoliticization of the role of nonstate actors in implementation, actions may still lead to politically contentious outcomes. Finally, nonstate climate and sustainability actions may not be self-reinforcing but may heavily depend on supporting mechanisms. The article concludes with governance risk-reduction strategies that can be combined to maximize nonstate potential in sustainable and climate-resilient transformations. This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance.

KW - climate change

KW - governance

KW - nonstate actions

KW - SDGs

KW - sustainable development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059509847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059509847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/wcc.572

DO - 10.1002/wcc.572

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change

JF - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change

SN - 1757-7799

M1 - e572

ER -