Prosocial and punishment behaviors in everyday life

Daniel Balliet*, Catherine Molho, Simon Columbus, Terence Dores Cruz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Theory and experiments suggest people have different strategies (1) to condition their prosocial behavior in ways that maximize individual benefits and (2) to punish others who have exploited their own and others’ prosocial behaviors. To date, most research testing existing theories has relied on experiments. However, documenting prosocial and punishment behaviors outside of the laboratory via experience sampling and diary methods can yield additional, rich insights. Recent work demonstrates these methods can describe social behaviors in daily life and be used to test theory about how behaviors change across situations and relationships. These methods have exposed discrepancies between what people experience in daily life and the problems researchers want to solve to understand the nature of human prosociality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)278-283
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychology
Volume43
Early online date18 Aug 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was funded by an ERC Consolidator Grant ( 864519 ) awarded to Daniel Balliet.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors

Funding

This research was funded by an ERC Consolidator Grant ( 864519 ) awarded to Daniel Balliet.

FundersFunder number
European Research Council
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme771391, 864519

    Keywords

    • Cooperation
    • Diary method
    • Experience sampling
    • Gossip
    • Punishment
    • Reputation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Prosocial and punishment behaviors in everyday life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this