Abstract
Theory and experiments suggest people have different strategies (1) to condition their prosocial behavior in ways that maximize individual benefits and (2) to punish others who have exploited their own and others’ prosocial behaviors. To date, most research testing existing theories has relied on experiments. However, documenting prosocial and punishment behaviors outside of the laboratory via experience sampling and diary methods can yield additional, rich insights. Recent work demonstrates these methods can describe social behaviors in daily life and be used to test theory about how behaviors change across situations and relationships. These methods have exposed discrepancies between what people experience in daily life and the problems researchers want to solve to understand the nature of human prosociality.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 278-283 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Current Opinion in Psychology |
| Volume | 43 |
| Early online date | 18 Aug 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research was funded by an ERC Consolidator Grant ( 864519 ) awarded to Daniel Balliet.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
Funding
This research was funded by an ERC Consolidator Grant ( 864519 ) awarded to Daniel Balliet.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| European Research Council | |
| Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 771391, 864519 |
Keywords
- Cooperation
- Diary method
- Experience sampling
- Gossip
- Punishment
- Reputation