Psychological capital and self-reported employee creativity: The Moderating role of supervisor support and job characteristics

W. Cai, E. Lysova, Bart Bossink, S.N. Khapova, Weidong Wang

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Although the positive effect of psychological capital (PsyCap) on employee performance is well documented, the conditions under which PsyCap exerts the most influence on creativity warrant further research. Complementing and extending prior studies, we theorize and examine how two critical contextual factors (supervisor support for creativity [SSC] and job characteristics) effectively activate PsyCap associated with self‐reported employee creativity. Drawing on an interactional perspective, we use trait activation theory to examine the moderating effects of SSC and job characteristics on the relationship between PsyCap and self‐reported employee creativity. Through rigorous hypotheses testing (N = 356 individuals from multiple industries in Chinese firms), our results demonstrate that both SSC and job characteristics positively moderate the PsyCap–creativity relationship. Additional analyses reveal that PsyCap is most effective at enhancing creativity when both SSC and job characteristics are high. Implications of these findings for theory, future research and practice are discussed.
LanguageEnglish
Article numberDOI: 10.1111/caim.12277
Pages1
Number of pages12
JournalCreativity and Innovation Management
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2019

Fingerprint

Supervisory personnel
Personnel
Chemical activation
Supervisor support
Employee creativity
Job characteristics
Psychological capital
Creativity
Testing
Industry

Keywords

  • Creativity
  • innovation

Cite this

@article{4e0036c0f6894dd6aef10fc565b52e4c,
title = "Psychological capital and self-reported employee creativity: The Moderating role of supervisor support and job characteristics",
abstract = "Although the positive effect of psychological capital (PsyCap) on employee performance is well documented, the conditions under which PsyCap exerts the most influence on creativity warrant further research. Complementing and extending prior studies, we theorize and examine how two critical contextual factors (supervisor support for creativity [SSC] and job characteristics) effectively activate PsyCap associated with self‐reported employee creativity. Drawing on an interactional perspective, we use trait activation theory to examine the moderating effects of SSC and job characteristics on the relationship between PsyCap and self‐reported employee creativity. Through rigorous hypotheses testing (N = 356 individuals from multiple industries in Chinese firms), our results demonstrate that both SSC and job characteristics positively moderate the PsyCap–creativity relationship. Additional analyses reveal that PsyCap is most effective at enhancing creativity when both SSC and job characteristics are high. Implications of these findings for theory, future research and practice are discussed.",
keywords = "Creativity, innovation",
author = "W. Cai and E. Lysova and Bart Bossink and S.N. Khapova and Weidong Wang",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1111/caim.12277",
language = "English",
pages = "1",
journal = "Creativity and Innovation Management",
issn = "0963-1690",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological capital and self-reported employee creativity

T2 - Creativity and Innovation Management

AU - Cai,W.

AU - Lysova,E.

AU - Bossink,Bart

AU - Khapova,S.N.

AU - Wang,Weidong

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Although the positive effect of psychological capital (PsyCap) on employee performance is well documented, the conditions under which PsyCap exerts the most influence on creativity warrant further research. Complementing and extending prior studies, we theorize and examine how two critical contextual factors (supervisor support for creativity [SSC] and job characteristics) effectively activate PsyCap associated with self‐reported employee creativity. Drawing on an interactional perspective, we use trait activation theory to examine the moderating effects of SSC and job characteristics on the relationship between PsyCap and self‐reported employee creativity. Through rigorous hypotheses testing (N = 356 individuals from multiple industries in Chinese firms), our results demonstrate that both SSC and job characteristics positively moderate the PsyCap–creativity relationship. Additional analyses reveal that PsyCap is most effective at enhancing creativity when both SSC and job characteristics are high. Implications of these findings for theory, future research and practice are discussed.

AB - Although the positive effect of psychological capital (PsyCap) on employee performance is well documented, the conditions under which PsyCap exerts the most influence on creativity warrant further research. Complementing and extending prior studies, we theorize and examine how two critical contextual factors (supervisor support for creativity [SSC] and job characteristics) effectively activate PsyCap associated with self‐reported employee creativity. Drawing on an interactional perspective, we use trait activation theory to examine the moderating effects of SSC and job characteristics on the relationship between PsyCap and self‐reported employee creativity. Through rigorous hypotheses testing (N = 356 individuals from multiple industries in Chinese firms), our results demonstrate that both SSC and job characteristics positively moderate the PsyCap–creativity relationship. Additional analyses reveal that PsyCap is most effective at enhancing creativity when both SSC and job characteristics are high. Implications of these findings for theory, future research and practice are discussed.

KW - Creativity

KW - innovation

UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/caim.12277

U2 - 10.1111/caim.12277

DO - 10.1111/caim.12277

M3 - Article

SP - 1

JO - Creativity and Innovation Management

JF - Creativity and Innovation Management

SN - 0963-1690

M1 - DOI: 10.1111/caim.12277

ER -