Psychological Distance to Science as a Predictor of Science Skepticism Across Domains

Bojana Većkalov, N. Zarzeczna, J. McPhetres, F. van Harreveld, B.T. Rutjens

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article presents and tests psychological distance to science (PSYDISC) as a domain-general predictor of science skepticism. Drawing on the concept of psychological distance, PSYDISC reflects the extent to which individuals perceive science as a tangible undertaking conducted by people similar to oneself (social), with effects in the here (spatial) and now (temporal), and as useful and applicable in the real world (hypothetical distance). In six studies (two preregistered; total N = 1,630) and two countries, we developed and established the factor structure and validity of a scale measuring PSYDISC. Crucially, higher PSYDISC predicted skepticism beyond established predictors, across science domains. A final study showed that PSYDISC shapes real-world behavior (COVID-19 vaccination uptake). This work thus provides a novel tool to predict science skepticism, as well as a construct that can help to further develop a unifying framework to understand science skepticism across domains.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-37
Number of pages20
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume50
Issue number1
Early online date3 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant Agreement No. 849125 awarded to B.T.R.).

FundersFunder number
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme849125
European Research Council

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Psychological Distance to Science as a Predictor of Science Skepticism Across Domains'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this