Abstract
Physicalism claims that the ontology of the world coincides with the ontology of physics. My paper offers a discussion and assessment of this claim. First, I explain why physicalism implies a straightforward ontological reductionism; hence, on an ontological reading, ‘non-reductive physicalism’ is a contradiction in terms. Second, I argue that, without further specification, the content of ‘the ontology of physics’ is completely undefined. Since this content is usually taken for granted in the philosophy of psychology and the philosophy of mind, the notion of physicalism has no positively determinable meaning. Third, by taking into account the full particulars of how observations of physical phenomena are realized in practice, I question the claim that reductive physicalism is confirmed by the cognitive achievements of connectionist networks. © 2001, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 775-786 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Theory and Psychology |
| Volume | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Psychology, Physicalism and Real Physics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver