TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric properties of the dutch version of the core measure of melancholia
AU - Rhebergen, D.
AU - Arts, D.L.
AU - Comijs, H.C.
AU - Beekman, A.T.F.
AU - Terwee, C.B.
AU - Parker, G.
AU - Stek, M.L.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Background: The CORE measure was designed to assess psychomotor symptoms and the probability of melancholia in depressed people. We tested the inter-rater reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the CORE. Methods: Thirty-seven elderly, depressed in-patients were studied. The CORE, Salpêtrière Retardation Rating Scale (SRRS), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-self-report version (QIDS) and Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were administered. The inter-rater reliability of the CORE was examined by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of agreement between five independent raters. Construct validity was assessed by calculating Spearman rho (ρ) correlations between CORE and SRRS, QIDS and MADRS measure scores. Results: The ICC for total CORE scores was 0.80, while, for the CORE sub-scales the ICCs were 0.74 for non-interactiveness, 0.70 for retardation and 0.79 for agitation, indicating high inter-rater reliability. Associations between the CORE and SRRS measures supported the validity of the CORE as a measure of psychomotor disturbance, while correlations between the CORE agitation sub-scale and agitation items derived from the QIDS and MADRS were low to moderate. Limitations: Both the sample size and the comparator measures of psychomotor disturbance (especially agitation) may have compromised construct validity analyses. Conclusions: High inter-rater reliability was demonstrated for the Dutch CORE measure. Its validity as a measure of psychomotor disturbance was supported in analyses involving total CORE scores. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.
AB - Background: The CORE measure was designed to assess psychomotor symptoms and the probability of melancholia in depressed people. We tested the inter-rater reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the CORE. Methods: Thirty-seven elderly, depressed in-patients were studied. The CORE, Salpêtrière Retardation Rating Scale (SRRS), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-self-report version (QIDS) and Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were administered. The inter-rater reliability of the CORE was examined by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of agreement between five independent raters. Construct validity was assessed by calculating Spearman rho (ρ) correlations between CORE and SRRS, QIDS and MADRS measure scores. Results: The ICC for total CORE scores was 0.80, while, for the CORE sub-scales the ICCs were 0.74 for non-interactiveness, 0.70 for retardation and 0.79 for agitation, indicating high inter-rater reliability. Associations between the CORE and SRRS measures supported the validity of the CORE as a measure of psychomotor disturbance, while correlations between the CORE agitation sub-scale and agitation items derived from the QIDS and MADRS were low to moderate. Limitations: Both the sample size and the comparator measures of psychomotor disturbance (especially agitation) may have compromised construct validity analyses. Conclusions: High inter-rater reliability was demonstrated for the Dutch CORE measure. Its validity as a measure of psychomotor disturbance was supported in analyses involving total CORE scores. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.043
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.043
M3 - Article
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 142
SP - 343
EP - 346
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
IS - 1-3
ER -