Psychotherapy for subclinical depression: meta analysis

P. Cuijpers, S.L. Koole, A. van Dijke, M. Roca, J. Li, C.F. Reynolds III

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: There is controversy about whether psychotherapies are effective in the treatment of subclinical depression, defined by clinically relevant depressive symptoms in the absence of a major depressive disorder. Aims: To examine whether psychotherapies are effective in reducing depressive symptoms, reduce the risk of developing major depressive disorder and have comparable effects to psychological treatment of major depression. Method: We conducted a meta-analysis of 18 studies comparing a psychological treatment of subclinical depression with a control group. Results: The target groups, therapies and characteristics of the included studies differed considerably from each other, and the quality of many studies was not optimal. Psychotherapies did have a small to moderate effect on depressive symptoms against care as usual at the post-test assessment (g = 0.35, 95% CI 0.23-0.47; NNT = 5, 95% CI 4-8) and significantly reduced the incidence of major depressive episodes at 6 months (RR = 0.61) and possibly at 12 months (RR = 0.74). The effects were significantly smaller than those of psychotherapy for major depressive disorder and could be accounted for by non-specific effects of treatment. Conclusions: Psychotherapy may be effective in the treatment of subclinical depression and reduce the incidence of major depression, but more high-quality research is needed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268-274
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume205
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Psychotherapy for subclinical depression: meta analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this