Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaire

Caroline B Terwee, Sandra D M Bot, Michael R de Boer, Daniëlle A W M van der Windt, Dirk L Knol, Joost Dekker, Lex M Bouter, Henrica C W de Vet

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recently, an increasing number of systematic reviews have been published in which the measurement properties of health status questionnaires are compared. For a meaningful comparison, quality criteria for measurement properties are needed. Our aim was to develop quality criteria for design, methods, and outcomes of studies on the development and evaluation of health status questionnaires. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Quality criteria for content validity, internal consistency, criterion validity, construct validity, reproducibility, longitudinal validity, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability were derived from existing guidelines and consensus within our research group. RESULTS: For each measurement property a criterion was defined for a positive, negative, or indeterminate rating, depending on the design, methods, and outcomes of the validation study. CONCLUSION: Our criteria make a substantial contribution toward defining explicit quality criteria for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Our criteria can be used in systematic reviews of health status questionnaires, to detect shortcomings and gaps in knowledge of measurement properties, and to design validation studies. The future challenge will be to refine and complete the criteria and to reach broad consensus, especially on quality criteria for good measurement properties.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-42
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Health Status
Validation Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Guidelines
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research

Keywords

  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Health Status Indicators
  • Humans
  • Psychometrics
  • Questionnaires
  • Questionnaires: standards
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Research Design
  • Review Literature as Topic

Cite this

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., ... de Vet, H. C. W. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
Terwee, Caroline B ; Bot, Sandra D M ; de Boer, Michael R ; van der Windt, Daniëlle A W M ; Knol, Dirk L ; Dekker, Joost ; Bouter, Lex M ; de Vet, Henrica C W. / Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaire. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2007 ; Vol. 60, No. 1. pp. 34-42.
@article{825011bac36d49ffad719f99b1348395,
title = "Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaire",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Recently, an increasing number of systematic reviews have been published in which the measurement properties of health status questionnaires are compared. For a meaningful comparison, quality criteria for measurement properties are needed. Our aim was to develop quality criteria for design, methods, and outcomes of studies on the development and evaluation of health status questionnaires. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Quality criteria for content validity, internal consistency, criterion validity, construct validity, reproducibility, longitudinal validity, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability were derived from existing guidelines and consensus within our research group. RESULTS: For each measurement property a criterion was defined for a positive, negative, or indeterminate rating, depending on the design, methods, and outcomes of the validation study. CONCLUSION: Our criteria make a substantial contribution toward defining explicit quality criteria for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Our criteria can be used in systematic reviews of health status questionnaires, to detect shortcomings and gaps in knowledge of measurement properties, and to design validation studies. The future challenge will be to refine and complete the criteria and to reach broad consensus, especially on quality criteria for good measurement properties.",
keywords = "Evaluation Studies as Topic, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Psychometrics, Questionnaires, Questionnaires: standards, Reproducibility of Results, Research Design, Review Literature as Topic",
author = "Terwee, {Caroline B} and Bot, {Sandra D M} and {de Boer}, {Michael R} and {van der Windt}, {Dani{\"e}lle A W M} and Knol, {Dirk L} and Joost Dekker and Bouter, {Lex M} and {de Vet}, {Henrica C W}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "34--42",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaire. / Terwee, Caroline B; Bot, Sandra D M; de Boer, Michael R; van der Windt, Daniëlle A W M; Knol, Dirk L; Dekker, Joost; Bouter, Lex M; de Vet, Henrica C W.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 60, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 34-42.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaire

AU - Terwee, Caroline B

AU - Bot, Sandra D M

AU - de Boer, Michael R

AU - van der Windt, Daniëlle A W M

AU - Knol, Dirk L

AU - Dekker, Joost

AU - Bouter, Lex M

AU - de Vet, Henrica C W

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Recently, an increasing number of systematic reviews have been published in which the measurement properties of health status questionnaires are compared. For a meaningful comparison, quality criteria for measurement properties are needed. Our aim was to develop quality criteria for design, methods, and outcomes of studies on the development and evaluation of health status questionnaires. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Quality criteria for content validity, internal consistency, criterion validity, construct validity, reproducibility, longitudinal validity, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability were derived from existing guidelines and consensus within our research group. RESULTS: For each measurement property a criterion was defined for a positive, negative, or indeterminate rating, depending on the design, methods, and outcomes of the validation study. CONCLUSION: Our criteria make a substantial contribution toward defining explicit quality criteria for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Our criteria can be used in systematic reviews of health status questionnaires, to detect shortcomings and gaps in knowledge of measurement properties, and to design validation studies. The future challenge will be to refine and complete the criteria and to reach broad consensus, especially on quality criteria for good measurement properties.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Recently, an increasing number of systematic reviews have been published in which the measurement properties of health status questionnaires are compared. For a meaningful comparison, quality criteria for measurement properties are needed. Our aim was to develop quality criteria for design, methods, and outcomes of studies on the development and evaluation of health status questionnaires. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Quality criteria for content validity, internal consistency, criterion validity, construct validity, reproducibility, longitudinal validity, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability were derived from existing guidelines and consensus within our research group. RESULTS: For each measurement property a criterion was defined for a positive, negative, or indeterminate rating, depending on the design, methods, and outcomes of the validation study. CONCLUSION: Our criteria make a substantial contribution toward defining explicit quality criteria for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Our criteria can be used in systematic reviews of health status questionnaires, to detect shortcomings and gaps in knowledge of measurement properties, and to design validation studies. The future challenge will be to refine and complete the criteria and to reach broad consensus, especially on quality criteria for good measurement properties.

KW - Evaluation Studies as Topic

KW - Health Status Indicators

KW - Humans

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Questionnaires: standards

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Research Design

KW - Review Literature as Topic

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 34

EP - 42

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 1

ER -