Quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes

Benjamin D. Stocker*, Jakob Zscheischler, Trevor F. Keenan, I. Colin Prentice, Josep Peñuelas, Sonia I. Seneviratne

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Terrestrial primary productivity and carbon cycle impacts of droughts are commonly quantified using vapour pressure deficit (VPD) data and remotely sensed greenness, without accounting for soil moisture. However, soil moisture limitation is known to strongly affect plant physiology. Here, we investigate light use efficiency, the ratio of gross primary productivity (GPP) to absorbed light. We derive its fractional reduction due to soil moisture (fLUE), separated from VPD and greenness changes, using artificial neural networks trained on eddy covariance data, multiple soil moisture datasets and remotely sensed greenness. This reveals substantial impacts of soil moisture alone that reduce GPP by up to 40% at sites located in sub-humid, semi-arid or arid regions. For sites in relatively moist climates, we find, paradoxically, a muted fLUE response to drying soil, but reduced fLUE under wet conditions. fLUE identifies substantial drought impacts that are not captured when relying solely on VPD and greenness changes and, when seasonally recurring, are missed by traditional, anomaly-based drought indices. Counter to common assumptions, fLUE reductions are largest in drought-deciduous vegetation, including grasslands. Our results highlight the necessity to account for soil moisture limitation in terrestrial primary productivity data products, especially for drought-related assessments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1430-1449
Number of pages20
JournalNew Phytologist
Volume218
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

Funding

We thank R. Orth for sharing code (SWBM model) and P. Greve for sharing data (global PET/P). B.D.S. was funded by an ERC Marie Sklodowska-Curie fellowship H2020-MSCA-IF-2015, project FIBER, grant no. 701329. J.P. was funded by ERC Synergy grant ERC-SyG-2013-610028 IMBALANCE-P, the Spanish Government grant CGL2016-79835-P and the Catalan Government grant SGR 2014-274. T.F.K. was supported by the NASA Terrestrial Ecology Program IDS Award NNH17AE86I. This work is a contribution to the AXA Chair Programme in Biosphere and Climate Impacts and the Imperial College Initiative on Grand Challenges in Ecosystems and the Environment (I.C.P.). S.I.S. acknowledges support from the EU FP7 programme, through the ERC DROUGHT-HEAT project (contract no. 617518). This work used eddy covariance data acquired and shared by the FLUXNET community, including these networks: AmeriFlux, AfriFlux, AsiaFlux, CarboAfrica, CarboEuropeIP, CarboItaly, CarboMont, ChinaFlux, Fluxnet-Canada, GreenGrass, ICOS, KoFlux, LBA, NECC, OzFlux-TERN, TCOS-Siberia and USCCC. The FLUXNET eddy covariance data processing and harmonization were carried out by the European Fluxes Database Cluster, AmeriFlux Management Project and Fluxdata project of FLUXNET, with the support of CDIAC and ICOS Ecosystem Thematic Center, and the OzFlux, ChinaFlux and AsiaFlux offices.

FundersFunder number
AsiaFlux offices
Catalan GovernmentSGR 2014-274
ChinaFlux
ERC Marie Sklodowska-CurieH2020-MSCA-IF-2015, ERC-SyG-2013-610028 IMBALANCE-P
EU FP7 programme
Spanish GovernmentCGL2016-79835-P
National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNNH17AE86I
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme701329
Seventh Framework Programme617518, 610028
European Research Council

    Keywords

    • drought impacts
    • eddy covariance
    • gross primary productivity (GPP)
    • light use efficiency
    • photosynthesis
    • soil moisture
    • standardized precipitation index
    • vapour pressure deficit (VPD)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this