Quo vadis, paradox? Centripetal and centrifugal forces in theory development

J. Schad, M.W. Lewis, W.K. Smith

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

© The Author(s) 2018.Organizations increasingly face contradictory goals, multiple stakeholder expectations, and pluralistic missions that surface and intensify competing demands. Paradox theory offers a lens to understand and engage these tensions. Yet as research adopting a paradox lens continues to grow, scholars warn that its success could advance a dominant logic, which will ultimately hinder conceptual development and result in its downfall. We suggest that scholars can avoid this denigration by embracing theory development’s driving forces—centripetal forces that define and buffer a conceptual core and centrifugal forces aimed at challenging the core and extending its boundaries. Although these forces’ directions diverge, we depict these dual forces as paradoxical—contradictory and fundamentally interdependent. That is, we explore paradoxical forces of theory development to understand the development of paradox theory. We offer means to use, balance, and leverage these insights to help surface the black boxes in paradox research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-119
JournalStrategic Organization
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Jonathan Schad thanks the Swiss National Science Foundation for funding (Grant Number 174920).

FundersFunder number
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung174920

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Quo vadis, paradox? Centripetal and centrifugal forces in theory development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this